A Vaidya betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 15 | 273 | 283 | 21.0 | 96.5 | 12.4 | 53.0 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 237 | 215 | 15 | 5.4 | 14.3 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where A Vaidya scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
181 runs off 187 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 96.8 vs 96.5 overall, average 36.2 vs 21.0 overall.
- Opposition: Germany (T20)LOW sample
126 runs off 111 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 113.5 vs 96.5 overall, average 31.5 vs 21.0 overall.
- Venue: GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 81 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 111.1 vs 96.5 overall, average 45.0 vs 21.0 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
89 runs off 69 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 129.0 vs 96.5 overall, average 89.0 vs 21.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
115 runs off 133 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 86.5 vs 96.5 overall, average 19.2 vs 21.0 overall.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample
62 runs off 79 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 78.5 vs 96.5 overall, average 15.5 vs 21.0 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 81 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 85.2 vs 96.5 overall, average 11.5 vs 21.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 84 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 88.1 vs 96.5 overall, average 12.3 vs 21.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 5 | 126 | 111 | 31.5 | 113.5 | 14.4 | 46.8 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 2 | 41 | 43 | 20.5 | 95.3 | 14.0 | 60.5 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 1 | 25 | 33 | 25.0 | 75.8 | 3.0 | 45.5 | LOW |
| Spain | T20 | 2 | 32 | 30 | 16.0 | 106.7 | 13.3 | 46.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Germany | T20 | 54 | 90 | 1 | 10.0 | 90.0 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 42 | 29 | 4 | 4.1 | 7.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen | T20 | 3 | 90 | 81 | 45.0 | 111.1 | 17.3 | 53.1 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 4 | 62 | 79 | 15.5 | 78.5 | 8.9 | 54.4 | LOW |
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 33 | 36 | 16.5 | 91.7 | 16.7 | 66.7 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 1 | 32 | 34 | 32.0 | 94.1 | 8.8 | 52.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 60 | 23 | 3 | 2.3 | 7.7 | LOW |
| FB Fields, St Clement | T20 | 48 | 19 | 3 | 2.4 | 6.3 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 39 | 43 | 4 | 6.6 | 10.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 15 | 273 | 283 | 21.0 | 96.5 | 12.4 | 53.0 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 237 | 215 | 15 | 5.4 | 14.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 12 | 181 | 187 | 36.2 | 96.8 | 15.0 | 56.7 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 9 | 74 | 84 | 12.3 | 88.1 | 6.0 | 47.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 111 | 94 | 9 | 5.1 | 10.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 66 | 66 | 2 | 6.0 | 33.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 60 | 55 | 4 | 5.5 | 13.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 115 | 133 | 19.2 | 86.5 | 12.0 | 60.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 10 | 69 | 81 | 11.5 | 85.2 | 9.9 | 54.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 89 | 69 | 89.0 | 129.0 | 15.9 | 36.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.