Abhishek Sharma betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 131 | 3865 | 2151 | 31.4 | 179.7 | 28.7 | 34.3 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 487 | 712 | 18 | 8.8 | 39.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Abhishek Sharma scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad (T20)HIGH sample
818 runs off 387 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 211.4 vs 179.7 overall, average 35.6 vs 31.4 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
1125 runs off 565 balls in 81 T20 matches — strike rate 199.1 vs 179.7 overall, average 30.4 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: England (T20)MEDIUM sample
419 runs off 208 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 201.4 vs 179.7 overall, average 38.1 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: Punjab Kings (T20)MEDIUM sample
406 runs off 191 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 212.6 vs 179.7 overall, average 58.0 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: Delhi Capitals (T20)MEDIUM sample
266 runs off 134 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 198.5 vs 179.7 overall, average 53.2 vs 31.4 overall.
- Venue: Dubai International Cricket Stadium (T20)MEDIUM sample
303 runs off 167 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 181.4 vs 179.7 overall, average 50.5 vs 31.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
2372 runs off 1401 balls in 122 T20 matches — strike rate 169.3 vs 179.7 overall, average 32.9 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: Chennai Super Kings (T20)MEDIUM sample
303 runs off 177 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 171.2 vs 179.7 overall, average 33.7 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: Gujarat Titans (T20)MEDIUM sample
239 runs off 160 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 149.4 vs 179.7 overall, average 34.1 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: Kolkata Knight Riders (T20)MEDIUM sample
227 runs off 156 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 145.5 vs 179.7 overall, average 18.9 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: Mumbai Indians (T20)MEDIUM sample
212 runs off 130 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 163.1 vs 179.7 overall, average 23.6 vs 31.4 overall.
- Opposition: Rajasthan Royals (T20)MEDIUM sample
190 runs off 130 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 146.2 vs 179.7 overall, average 21.1 vs 31.4 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| England | T20 | 11 | 419 | 208 | 38.1 | 201.4 | 33.7 | 32.2 | MEDIUM |
| Punjab Kings | T20 | 7 | 406 | 191 | 58.0 | 212.6 | 35.6 | 31.9 | MEDIUM |
| Chennai Super Kings | T20 | 9 | 303 | 177 | 33.7 | 171.2 | 24.3 | 28.2 | MEDIUM |
| Gujarat Titans | T20 | 7 | 239 | 160 | 34.1 | 149.4 | 21.9 | 37.5 | MEDIUM |
| Kolkata Knight Riders | T20 | 12 | 227 | 156 | 18.9 | 145.5 | 21.8 | 39.7 | MEDIUM |
| Delhi Capitals | T20 | 7 | 266 | 134 | 53.2 | 198.5 | 31.3 | 26.9 | MEDIUM |
| Mumbai Indians | T20 | 9 | 212 | 130 | 23.6 | 163.1 | 24.6 | 35.4 | MEDIUM |
| Rajasthan Royals | T20 | 10 | 190 | 130 | 21.1 | 146.2 | 23.1 | 36.9 | MEDIUM |
| South Africa | T20 | 9 | 215 | 127 | 23.9 | 169.3 | 29.1 | 44.1 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 8 | 190 | 120 | 23.8 | 158.3 | 23.3 | 39.2 | MEDIUM |
| Australia | T20 | 5 | 163 | 100 | 40.8 | 163.0 | 24.0 | 34.0 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 6 | 234 | 94 | 46.8 | 248.9 | 42.6 | 22.3 | LOW |
| Royal Challengers Bengaluru | T20 | 5 | 162 | 81 | 32.4 | 200.0 | 30.9 | 28.4 | LOW |
| Lucknow Super Giants | T20 | 6 | 160 | 71 | 32.0 | 225.4 | 39.4 | 31.0 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 4 | 110 | 62 | 27.5 | 177.4 | 29.0 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 4 | 110 | 59 | 55.0 | 186.4 | 30.5 | 33.9 | LOW |
| Royal Challengers Bangalore | T20 | 4 | 71 | 55 | 17.8 | 129.1 | 23.6 | 54.5 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 1 | 61 | 30 | 61.0 | 203.3 | 33.3 | 20.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 107 | 151 | 5 | 8.5 | 30.2 | LOW |
| Rajasthan Royals | T20 | 60 | 79 | 2 | 7.9 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Delhi Capitals | T20 | 48 | 72 | 1 | 9.0 | 72.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad | T20 | 25 | 818 | 387 | 35.6 | 211.4 | 34.9 | 30.0 | HIGH |
| Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 10 | 357 | 217 | 35.7 | 164.5 | 24.9 | 34.6 | MEDIUM |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 8 | 303 | 167 | 50.5 | 181.4 | 27.5 | 29.9 | MEDIUM |
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | T20 | 9 | 218 | 131 | 24.2 | 166.4 | 26.7 | 39.7 | MEDIUM |
| Dr DY Patil Sports Academy, Mumbai | T20 | 4 | 161 | 118 | 40.3 | 136.4 | 16.9 | 31.4 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 10 | 163 | 113 | 16.3 | 144.2 | 20.4 | 38.1 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | T20 | 6 | 203 | 108 | 33.8 | 188.0 | 31.5 | 38.9 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 7 | 135 | 91 | 19.3 | 148.4 | 22.0 | 42.9 | LOW |
| Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium, Pune | T20 | 4 | 120 | 89 | 30.0 | 134.8 | 20.2 | 40.4 | LOW |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | T20 | 4 | 160 | 75 | 40.0 | 213.3 | 40.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Sawai Mansingh Stadium, Jaipur | T20 | 2 | 112 | 63 | 56.0 | 177.8 | 30.2 | 27.0 | LOW |
| Brabourne Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 3 | 57 | 44 | 19.0 | 129.5 | 22.7 | 52.3 | LOW |
| Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 3 | 84 | 41 | 28.0 | 204.9 | 34.1 | 29.3 | LOW |
| Maharaja Yadavindra Singh International Cricket Stadium, New Chandigarh | T20 | 3 | 91 | 38 | 30.3 | 239.5 | 39.5 | 31.6 | LOW |
| Melbourne Cricket Ground | T20 | 1 | 68 | 37 | 68.0 | 183.8 | 27.0 | 18.9 | LOW |
| Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow | T20 | 2 | 93 | 36 | 46.5 | 258.3 | 44.4 | 27.8 | LOW |
| Vidarbha Cricket Association Stadium, Jamtha, Nagpur | T20 | 1 | 84 | 35 | 84.0 | 240.0 | 37.1 | 20.0 | LOW |
| M Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bengaluru | T20 | 2 | 41 | 30 | 20.5 | 136.7 | 16.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad | T20 | 108 | 182 | 1 | 10.1 | 182.0 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 107 | 151 | 5 | 8.5 | 30.2 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 66 | 79 | 5 | 7.2 | 15.8 | LOW |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | T20 | 42 | 61 | 2 | 8.7 | 30.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 123 | 3712 | 2047 | 32.3 | 181.3 | 29.1 | 34.0 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 7 | 135 | 91 | 19.3 | 148.4 | 22.0 | 42.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 368 | 552 | 13 | 9.0 | 42.5 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 107 | 151 | 5 | 8.5 | 30.2 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 122 | 2543 | 1424 | 37.4 | 178.6 | 30.6 | 38.8 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 60 | 1187 | 646 | 25.3 | 183.7 | 25.4 | 25.1 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 10 | 135 | 81 | 16.9 | 166.7 | 22.2 | 29.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 336 | 456 | 13 | 8.1 | 35.1 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 90 | 147 | 0 | 9.8 | — | LOW |
| death | T20 | 61 | 109 | 5 | 10.7 | 21.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 122 | 2372 | 1401 | 32.9 | 169.3 | 28.1 | 38.3 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 81 | 1125 | 565 | 30.4 | 199.1 | 29.4 | 27.6 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 32 | 368 | 185 | 26.3 | 198.9 | 31.4 | 24.9 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.