B Biza betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 377 | 402 | 18.0 | 93.8 | 10.7 | 48.5 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 9 | 220 | 355 | 31.4 | 62.0 | 5.6 | 61.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 331 | 372 | 20 | 6.7 | 18.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | ODI | 199 | 156 | 4 | 4.7 | 39.0 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where B Biza scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
285 runs off 278 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 102.5 vs 93.8 overall, average 21.9 vs 18.0 overall.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 97 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 105.2 vs 93.8 overall, average 34.0 vs 18.0 overall.
- Venue: Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas (ODI)LOW sample
66 runs off 82 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 80.5 vs 62.0 overall, not yet dismissed vs 31.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
92 runs off 124 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 74.2 vs 93.8 overall, average 11.5 vs 18.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
148 runs off 177 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 83.6 vs 93.8 overall, average 21.1 vs 18.0 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
50 runs off 73 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 68.5 vs 93.8 overall, average 12.5 vs 18.0 overall.
- Opposition: New Zealand (T20)LOW sample
53 runs off 67 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 79.1 vs 93.8 overall, average 26.5 vs 18.0 overall.
- Venue: Seddon Park, Hamilton (T20)LOW sample
53 runs off 67 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 79.1 vs 93.8 overall, average 26.5 vs 18.0 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| United States of America | ODI | 7 | 189 | 309 | 37.8 | 61.2 | 4.9 | 60.2 | HIGH |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 3 | 102 | 97 | 34.0 | 105.2 | 11.3 | 43.3 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 4 | 50 | 73 | 12.5 | 68.5 | 6.8 | 57.5 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 3 | 53 | 67 | 26.5 | 79.1 | 7.5 | 46.3 | LOW |
| Ireland | ODI | 2 | 31 | 46 | 15.5 | 67.4 | 10.9 | 67.4 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 3 | 39 | 46 | 19.5 | 84.8 | 6.5 | 45.7 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 4 | 47 | 43 | 11.8 | 109.3 | 14.0 | 46.5 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34.0 | 100.0 | 11.8 | 47.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| United States of America | ODI | 169 | 123 | 4 | 4.4 | 30.8 | MEDIUM |
| United States of America | T20 | 72 | 62 | 5 | 5.2 | 12.4 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 67 | 78 | 8 | 7.0 | 9.8 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 54 | 79 | 2 | 8.8 | 39.5 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 54 | 45 | 3 | 5.0 | 15.0 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 36 | 44 | 2 | 7.3 | 22.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 5 | 123 | 227 | 24.6 | 54.2 | 5.3 | 65.6 | MEDIUM |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 130 | 151 | 21.7 | 86.1 | 7.9 | 49.7 | MEDIUM |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | ODI | 2 | 66 | 82 | — | 80.5 | 3.7 | 45.1 | LOW |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 3 | 53 | 67 | 26.5 | 79.1 | 7.5 | 46.3 | LOW |
| Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast | ODI | 2 | 31 | 46 | 15.5 | 67.4 | 10.9 | 67.4 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | T20 | 3 | 39 | 46 | 19.5 | 84.8 | 6.5 | 45.7 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 2 | 41 | 43 | 20.5 | 95.3 | 11.6 | 53.5 | LOW |
| Pembroke Cricket Club, Sandymount, Dublin | T20 | 3 | 43 | 40 | 14.3 | 107.5 | 12.5 | 45.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 103 | 109 | 9 | 6.3 | 12.1 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 96 | 76 | 3 | 4.8 | 25.3 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | ODI | 73 | 47 | 1 | 3.9 | 47.0 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | T20 | 72 | 62 | 5 | 5.2 | 12.4 | LOW |
| National Stadium, Karachi | T20 | 54 | 79 | 2 | 8.8 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 36 | 25 | 2 | 4.2 | 12.5 | LOW |
| Pembroke Cricket Club, Sandymount, Dublin | T20 | 36 | 44 | 2 | 7.3 | 22.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 23 | 373 | 399 | 18.6 | 93.5 | 10.5 | 48.4 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 5 | 123 | 227 | 24.6 | 54.2 | 5.3 | 65.6 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 4 | 97 | 128 | 48.5 | 75.8 | 6.3 | 53.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 331 | 372 | 20 | 6.7 | 18.6 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 103 | 80 | 1 | 4.7 | 80.0 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 96 | 76 | 3 | 4.8 | 25.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 8 | 196 | 310 | 32.7 | 63.2 | 5.5 | 59.7 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 16 | 148 | 177 | 21.1 | 83.6 | 10.7 | 56.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 14 | 157 | 167 | 17.4 | 94.0 | 7.8 | 41.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 8 | 72 | 58 | 14.4 | 124.1 | 19.0 | 44.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 3 | 14 | 31 | — | 45.2 | 6.5 | 74.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 240 | 266 | 11 | 6.7 | 24.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 199 | 156 | 4 | 4.7 | 39.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 73 | 75 | 9 | 6.2 | 8.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | ODI | 8 | 198 | 319 | 33.0 | 62.1 | 5.6 | 60.8 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 23 | 285 | 278 | 21.9 | 102.5 | 11.9 | 44.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 12 | 92 | 124 | 11.5 | 74.2 | 8.1 | 58.1 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.