C Chatonzwa betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | ODI | 4 | 39 | 107 | 9.8 | 36.4 | 2.8 | 75.7 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 8 | 42 | 58 | 14.0 | 72.4 | 3.4 | 41.4 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 156 | 137 | 6 | 5.3 | 22.8 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 150 | 173 | 6 | 6.9 | 28.8 | MEDIUM |
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Thailand | ODI | 2 | 26 | 80 | 13.0 | 32.5 | 2.5 | 78.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| United States of America | ODI | 96 | 90 | 3 | 5.6 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Thailand | ODI | 60 | 47 | 3 | 4.7 | 15.7 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 48 | 80 | 0 | 10.0 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | ODI | 2 | 26 | 80 | 13.0 | 32.5 | 2.5 | 78.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 96 | 90 | 3 | 5.6 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | ODI | 60 | 47 | 3 | 4.7 | 15.7 | LOW |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 48 | 80 | 0 | 10.0 | — | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 48 | 41 | 6 | 5.1 | 6.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | ODI | 3 | 31 | 87 | 10.3 | 35.6 | 3.4 | 78.2 | LOW |
| Unknown | T20 | 8 | 42 | 58 | 14.0 | 72.4 | 3.4 | 41.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 150 | 173 | 6 | 6.9 | 28.8 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 96 | 90 | 3 | 5.6 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Unknown | ODI | 60 | 47 | 3 | 4.7 | 15.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 4 | 39 | 107 | 9.8 | 36.4 | 2.8 | 75.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 6 | 35 | 40 | 17.5 | 87.5 | 5.0 | 37.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | ODI | 126 | 101 | 5 | 4.8 | 20.2 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 72 | 70 | 3 | 5.8 | 23.3 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 42 | 55 | 3 | 7.9 | 18.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 36 | 48 | 0 | 8.0 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | ODI | 4 | 30 | 89 | 15.0 | 33.7 | 2.2 | 77.5 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 7 | 31 | 40 | 15.5 | 77.5 | 5.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.