CR Ervine betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | TEST | 14 | 791 | 1625 | 30.4 | 48.7 | 5.6 | 73.5 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 25 | 912 | 1088 | 41.5 | 83.8 | 10.4 | 54.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 34 | 660 | 615 | 20.6 | 107.3 | 12.5 | 40.2 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where CR Ervine scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Bangladesh (TEST)HIGH sample
258 runs off 532 balls in 4 TEST matches — strike rate 48.5 vs 48.7 overall, average 43.0 vs 30.4 overall.
- Opposition: Ireland (ODI)HIGH sample
309 runs off 352 balls in 7 ODI matches — strike rate 87.8 vs 83.8 overall, average 61.8 vs 41.5 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (ODI)HIGH sample
493 runs off 527 balls in 11 ODI matches — strike rate 93.5 vs 83.8 overall, average 61.6 vs 41.5 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (TEST)HIGH sample
462 runs off 805 balls in 13 TEST matches — strike rate 57.4 vs 48.7 overall, average 38.5 vs 30.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)HIGH sample
280 runs off 360 balls in 22 ODI matches — strike rate 77.8 vs 83.8 overall, average 56.0 vs 41.5 overall.
- Opposition: West Indies (TEST)MEDIUM sample
124 runs off 190 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 65.3 vs 48.7 overall, average 31.0 vs 30.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)HIGH sample
399 runs off 492 balls in 25 ODI matches — strike rate 81.1 vs 83.8 overall, average 33.3 vs 41.5 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
322 runs off 342 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 94.2 vs 107.3 overall, average 16.9 vs 20.6 overall.
- Opposition: Sri Lanka (ODI)MEDIUM sample
196 runs off 244 balls in 7 ODI matches — strike rate 80.3 vs 83.8 overall, average 28.0 vs 41.5 overall.
- Opposition: New Zealand (TEST)MEDIUM sample
85 runs off 228 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 37.3 vs 48.7 overall, average 21.3 vs 30.4 overall.
- Venue: Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo (ODI)MEDIUM sample
116 runs off 169 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 68.6 vs 83.8 overall, average 19.3 vs 41.5 overall.
- Venue: Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast (ODI)MEDIUM sample
121 runs off 161 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 75.2 vs 83.8 overall, average 60.5 vs 41.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Bangladesh | TEST | 4 | 258 | 532 | 43.0 | 48.5 | 6.0 | 73.7 | HIGH |
| Ireland | ODI | 7 | 309 | 352 | 61.8 | 87.8 | 9.9 | 52.3 | HIGH |
| South Africa | TEST | 2 | 151 | 291 | 37.8 | 51.9 | 6.5 | 71.8 | MEDIUM |
| Sri Lanka | TEST | 2 | 117 | 253 | 29.3 | 46.2 | 4.3 | 75.1 | MEDIUM |
| Sri Lanka | ODI | 7 | 196 | 244 | 28.0 | 80.3 | 9.4 | 51.2 | MEDIUM |
| New Zealand | TEST | 2 | 85 | 228 | 21.3 | 37.3 | 5.3 | 80.7 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 10 | 205 | 192 | 25.6 | 106.8 | 9.9 | 34.9 | MEDIUM |
| West Indies | TEST | 2 | 124 | 190 | 31.0 | 65.3 | 5.8 | 63.7 | MEDIUM |
| Netherlands | ODI | 4 | 137 | 150 | 34.3 | 91.3 | 13.3 | 58.7 | MEDIUM |
| Nepal | ODI | 1 | 121 | 128 | — | 94.5 | 12.5 | 46.9 | MEDIUM |
| Pakistan | ODI | 3 | 75 | 110 | 25.0 | 68.2 | 7.3 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 4 | 109 | 101 | 27.3 | 107.9 | 11.9 | 34.7 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 7 | 74 | 81 | 10.6 | 91.4 | 11.1 | 49.4 | LOW |
| England | TEST | 1 | 44 | 77 | 22.0 | 57.1 | 7.8 | 72.7 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 3 | 80 | 71 | 26.7 | 112.7 | 14.1 | 43.7 | LOW |
| West Indies | ODI | 1 | 47 | 58 | 47.0 | 81.0 | 12.1 | 62.1 | LOW |
| Ireland | TEST | 1 | 12 | 54 | 6.0 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 77.8 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 1 | 58 | 52 | 58.0 | 111.5 | 11.5 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Oman | ODI | 1 | 25 | 40 | 25.0 | 62.5 | 10.0 | 75.0 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 1 | 38 | 30 | 38.0 | 126.7 | 16.7 | 40.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | TEST | 6 | 360 | 709 | 30.0 | 50.8 | 5.9 | 72.5 | HIGH |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 11 | 493 | 527 | 61.6 | 93.5 | 12.0 | 52.2 | HIGH |
| Harare Sports Club | TEST | 3 | 177 | 353 | 35.4 | 50.1 | 5.1 | 72.8 | HIGH |
| Shere Bangla National Stadium, Mirpur | TEST | 1 | 150 | 276 | 150.0 | 54.3 | 7.2 | 71.0 | MEDIUM |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | ODI | 6 | 116 | 169 | 19.3 | 68.6 | 8.9 | 63.9 | MEDIUM |
| Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast | ODI | 2 | 121 | 161 | 60.5 | 75.2 | 9.3 | 57.8 | MEDIUM |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 9 | 185 | 147 | 23.1 | 125.9 | 17.7 | 40.1 | MEDIUM |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 6 | 146 | 138 | 24.3 | 105.8 | 11.6 | 37.7 | MEDIUM |
| Pallekele International Cricket Stadium | ODI | 3 | 100 | 119 | 33.3 | 84.0 | 8.4 | 45.4 | LOW |
| R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo | ODI | 3 | 82 | 112 | 27.3 | 73.2 | 8.9 | 56.3 | LOW |
| Zahur Ahmed Chowdhury Stadium, Chattogram | TEST | 1 | 30 | 87 | 15.0 | 34.5 | 3.4 | 81.6 | LOW |
| Trent Bridge, Nottingham | TEST | 1 | 44 | 77 | 22.0 | 57.1 | 7.8 | 72.7 | LOW |
| R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo | T20 | 3 | 80 | 71 | 26.7 | 112.7 | 14.1 | 43.7 | LOW |
| Bellerive Oval, Hobart | T20 | 3 | 69 | 70 | 23.0 | 98.6 | 10.0 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Sylhet International Cricket Stadium | TEST | 1 | 18 | 69 | 9.0 | 26.1 | 2.9 | 84.1 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 71 | 61 | 35.5 | 116.4 | 9.8 | 29.5 | LOW |
| Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast | TEST | 1 | 12 | 54 | 6.0 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 77.8 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 46 | 51 | 15.3 | 90.2 | 7.8 | 39.2 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | TEST | 11 | 614 | 1272 | 29.2 | 48.3 | 5.7 | 73.7 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 14 | 419 | 561 | 29.9 | 74.7 | 8.9 | 56.7 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 11 | 493 | 527 | 61.6 | 93.5 | 12.0 | 52.2 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 514 | 477 | 19.8 | 107.8 | 12.8 | 40.9 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | TEST | 3 | 177 | 353 | 35.4 | 50.1 | 5.1 | 72.8 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 6 | 146 | 138 | 24.3 | 105.8 | 11.6 | 37.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| old_ball | TEST | 14 | 701 | 1400 | 29.2 | 50.1 | 6.0 | 73.2 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 20 | 599 | 695 | 42.8 | 86.2 | 9.5 | 49.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 22 | 280 | 360 | 56.0 | 77.8 | 11.9 | 65.3 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 33 | 322 | 342 | 16.9 | 94.2 | 12.9 | 52.9 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 15 | 260 | 230 | 28.9 | 113.0 | 10.0 | 26.1 | MEDIUM |
| new_ball | TEST | 9 | 90 | 225 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 3.1 | 75.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 6 | 78 | 43 | 19.5 | 181.4 | 23.3 | 14.0 | LOW |
| death | ODI | 4 | 33 | 33 | 11.0 | 100.0 | 12.1 | 33.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | TEST | 13 | 462 | 805 | 38.5 | 57.4 | 6.5 | 69.4 | HIGH |
| PACE | TEST | 13 | 289 | 696 | 24.1 | 41.5 | 4.9 | 76.6 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 19 | 433 | 527 | 43.3 | 82.2 | 8.3 | 50.5 | HIGH |
| PACE | ODI | 25 | 399 | 492 | 33.3 | 81.1 | 11.6 | 60.2 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 265 | 281 | 18.9 | 94.3 | 11.7 | 47.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 24 | 308 | 265 | 22.0 | 116.2 | 13.2 | 34.3 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | TEST | 5 | 40 | 124 | 20.0 | 32.3 | 4.0 | 82.3 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 7 | 80 | 69 | — | 115.9 | 17.4 | 44.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 87 | 69 | 21.8 | 126.1 | 13.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.