CS Mugeri-Tiripano betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 46 | 966 | 920 | 26.1 | 105.0 | 13.3 | 46.1 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 14 | 445 | 584 | 34.2 | 76.2 | 10.4 | 60.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where CS Mugeri-Tiripano scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: United States of America (ODI)MEDIUM sample
249 runs off 285 balls in 7 ODI matches — strike rate 87.4 vs 76.2 overall, average 41.5 vs 34.2 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
259 runs off 222 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 116.7 vs 105.0 overall, average 51.8 vs 26.1 overall.
- Venue: Centre for Cricket Development Ground, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample
172 runs off 150 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 114.7 vs 105.0 overall, average 57.3 vs 26.1 overall.
- Venue: Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample
146 runs off 124 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 117.7 vs 105.0 overall, average 29.2 vs 26.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
192 runs off 128 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 150.0 vs 105.0 overall, average 27.4 vs 26.1 overall.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)LOW sample
127 runs off 104 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 122.1 vs 105.0 overall, average 31.8 vs 26.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
331 runs off 347 balls in 35 T20 matches — strike rate 95.4 vs 105.0 overall, average 23.6 vs 26.1 overall.
- Opposition: Ireland (ODI)MEDIUM sample
126 runs off 198 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 63.6 vs 76.2 overall, average 42.0 vs 34.2 overall.
- Venue: Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast (ODI)MEDIUM sample
104 runs off 157 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 66.2 vs 76.2 overall, average 52.0 vs 34.2 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)MEDIUM sample
100 runs off 147 balls in 10 ODI matches — strike rate 68.0 vs 76.2 overall, average 50.0 vs 34.2 overall.
- Opposition: Ireland (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 117 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 85.5 vs 105.0 overall, average 20.0 vs 26.1 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 83 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 90.4 vs 105.0 overall, average 18.8 vs 26.1 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| United States of America | ODI | 7 | 249 | 285 | 41.5 | 87.4 | 13.3 | 59.3 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 8 | 259 | 222 | 51.8 | 116.7 | 14.0 | 39.2 | MEDIUM |
| Ireland | ODI | 3 | 126 | 198 | 42.0 | 63.6 | 7.1 | 59.1 | MEDIUM |
| Ireland | T20 | 5 | 100 | 117 | 20.0 | 85.5 | 6.8 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 6 | 121 | 110 | 30.3 | 110.0 | 20.0 | 57.3 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 6 | 127 | 104 | 31.8 | 122.1 | 9.6 | 33.7 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 3 | 90 | 90 | 45.0 | 100.0 | 14.4 | 52.2 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 4 | 75 | 83 | 18.8 | 90.4 | 12.0 | 54.2 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 3 | 62 | 66 | 20.7 | 93.9 | 9.1 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | ODI | 1 | 52 | 59 | 52.0 | 88.1 | 10.2 | 54.2 | LOW |
| Thailand | ODI | 3 | 18 | 42 | 6.0 | 42.9 | 7.1 | 78.6 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 3 | 26 | 31 | 8.7 | 83.9 | 16.1 | 61.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 7 | 262 | 319 | 37.4 | 82.1 | 12.9 | 63.3 | HIGH |
| Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast | ODI | 2 | 104 | 157 | 52.0 | 66.2 | 7.0 | 56.7 | MEDIUM |
| Centre for Cricket Development Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 172 | 150 | 57.3 | 114.7 | 17.3 | 46.0 | MEDIUM |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 146 | 124 | 29.2 | 117.7 | 10.5 | 33.9 | MEDIUM |
| Pembroke Cricket Club, Sandymount, Dublin | T20 | 3 | 92 | 107 | 30.7 | 86.0 | 7.5 | 40.2 | LOW |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 5 | 101 | 82 | 25.3 | 123.2 | 14.6 | 42.7 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 4 | 81 | 80 | 27.0 | 101.3 | 11.3 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | ODI | 2 | 61 | 66 | 61.0 | 92.4 | 9.1 | 40.9 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | T20 | 3 | 62 | 66 | 20.7 | 93.9 | 9.1 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 2 | 70 | 65 | 70.0 | 107.7 | 15.4 | 47.7 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 58 | 54 | 19.3 | 107.4 | 22.2 | 63.0 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 2 | 53 | 48 | 53.0 | 110.4 | 10.4 | 41.7 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | ODI | 3 | 18 | 42 | 6.0 | 42.9 | 7.1 | 78.6 | LOW |
| Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 3 | 48 | 41 | 24.0 | 117.1 | 14.6 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 3 | 26 | 31 | 8.7 | 83.9 | 16.1 | 61.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 44 | 896 | 855 | 24.9 | 104.8 | 13.1 | 46.0 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 7 | 262 | 319 | 37.4 | 82.1 | 12.9 | 63.3 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 7 | 183 | 265 | 30.5 | 69.1 | 7.5 | 56.2 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 2 | 70 | 65 | 70.0 | 107.7 | 15.4 | 47.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 31 | 443 | 445 | 27.7 | 99.6 | 9.4 | 40.4 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 10 | 305 | 392 | 38.1 | 77.8 | 9.4 | 55.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 35 | 331 | 347 | 23.6 | 95.4 | 15.9 | 57.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 12 | 116 | 164 | 29.0 | 70.7 | 13.4 | 73.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 13 | 192 | 128 | 27.4 | 150.0 | 19.5 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 41 | 630 | 600 | 28.6 | 105.0 | 12.0 | 45.0 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 13 | 328 | 422 | 29.8 | 77.7 | 10.4 | 58.3 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 33 | 294 | 273 | 21.0 | 107.7 | 16.5 | 48.0 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 10 | 100 | 147 | 50.0 | 68.0 | 9.5 | 66.0 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 42 | 47 | 42.0 | 89.4 | 10.6 | 48.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.