CT Dhururu betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 33 | 336 | 401 | 14.6 | 83.8 | 7.7 | 46.4 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 12 | 156 | 378 | 14.2 | 41.3 | 4.0 | 74.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where CT Dhururu scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)MEDIUM sample
90 runs off 179 balls in 10 ODI matches — strike rate 50.3 vs 41.3 overall, average 10.0 vs 14.2 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
126 runs off 131 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 96.2 vs 83.8 overall, average 31.5 vs 14.6 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
80 runs off 157 balls in 10 ODI matches — strike rate 51.0 vs 41.3 overall, average 8.9 vs 14.2 overall.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)LOW sample
91 runs off 106 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 85.8 vs 83.8 overall, average 22.8 vs 14.6 overall.
- Venue: Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 64 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 107.8 vs 83.8 overall, average 69.0 vs 14.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)MEDIUM sample
63 runs off 195 balls in 9 ODI matches — strike rate 32.3 vs 41.3 overall, average 31.5 vs 14.2 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)MEDIUM sample
63 runs off 207 balls in 8 ODI matches — strike rate 30.4 vs 41.3 overall, average 31.5 vs 14.2 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
45 runs off 66 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 68.2 vs 83.8 overall, average 11.3 vs 14.6 overall.
- Venue: Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
47 runs off 74 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 63.5 vs 83.8 overall, average 9.4 vs 14.6 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
44 runs off 61 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 72.1 vs 83.8 overall, average 22.0 vs 14.6 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Ireland | ODI | 9 | 124 | 320 | 13.8 | 38.8 | 4.4 | 76.6 | HIGH |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 5 | 91 | 106 | 22.8 | 85.8 | 7.5 | 44.3 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 8 | 80 | 97 | 13.3 | 82.5 | 7.2 | 43.3 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 5 | 45 | 66 | 11.3 | 68.2 | 7.6 | 57.6 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | ODI | 2 | 29 | 52 | 29.0 | 55.8 | 1.9 | 63.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 9 | 140 | 318 | 17.5 | 44.0 | 4.4 | 73.6 | HIGH |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 6 | 63 | 77 | 15.8 | 81.8 | 6.5 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 47 | 74 | 9.4 | 63.5 | 4.1 | 55.4 | LOW |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 2 | 69 | 64 | 69.0 | 107.8 | 10.9 | 32.8 | LOW |
| Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast | ODI | 2 | 13 | 54 | 6.5 | 24.1 | 1.9 | 81.5 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 2 | 21 | 32 | 21.0 | 65.6 | 9.4 | 68.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 27 | 273 | 324 | 14.4 | 84.3 | 8.0 | 47.8 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 9 | 140 | 318 | 17.5 | 44.0 | 4.4 | 73.6 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 6 | 63 | 77 | 15.8 | 81.8 | 6.5 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Unknown | ODI | 3 | 16 | 60 | 5.3 | 26.7 | 1.7 | 80.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 20 | 177 | 212 | 17.7 | 83.5 | 7.5 | 45.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 8 | 63 | 207 | 31.5 | 30.4 | 3.9 | 81.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 10 | 80 | 157 | 8.9 | 51.0 | 4.5 | 69.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 19 | 115 | 128 | 10.5 | 89.8 | 7.0 | 39.8 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 6 | 44 | 61 | 22.0 | 72.1 | 9.8 | 63.9 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 29 | 190 | 240 | 10.6 | 79.2 | 6.7 | 46.7 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 9 | 63 | 195 | 31.5 | 32.3 | 3.6 | 79.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 10 | 90 | 179 | 10.0 | 50.3 | 4.5 | 70.4 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 20 | 126 | 131 | 31.5 | 96.2 | 10.7 | 46.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 20 | 30 | 20.0 | 66.7 | 3.3 | 43.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.