E Thelander betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 15 | 219 | 276 | 18.3 | 79.3 | 5.8 | 50.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where E Thelander scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
111 runs off 142 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 78.2 vs 79.3 overall, average 27.8 vs 18.3 overall.
- Venue: Albertslund Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 78 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 98.7 vs 79.3 overall, average 38.5 vs 18.3 overall.
- Venue: GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen (T20)LOW sample
59 runs off 63 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 93.7 vs 79.3 overall, average 19.7 vs 18.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
41 runs off 79 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 51.9 vs 79.3 overall, average 10.3 vs 18.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 5 | 83 | 103 | 16.6 | 80.6 | 6.8 | 54.4 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 1 | 45 | 44 | 45.0 | 102.3 | 4.5 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 1 | 25 | 30 | 25.0 | 83.3 | 6.7 | 43.3 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 2 | 22 | 30 | — | 73.3 | 6.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 77 | 78 | 38.5 | 98.7 | 5.1 | 37.2 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 4 | 52 | 72 | 17.3 | 72.2 | 5.6 | 50.0 | LOW |
| GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen | T20 | 3 | 59 | 63 | 19.7 | 93.7 | 11.1 | 49.2 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 15 | 219 | 276 | 18.3 | 79.3 | 5.8 | 50.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 10 | 111 | 142 | 27.8 | 78.2 | 4.2 | 47.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 10 | 41 | 79 | 10.3 | 51.9 | 3.8 | 68.4 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 6 | 67 | 55 | 16.8 | 121.8 | 12.7 | 32.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 10 | 91 | 107 | 45.5 | 85.0 | 5.6 | 44.9 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 67 | 90 | 11.2 | 74.4 | 8.9 | 56.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 61 | 79 | 15.3 | 77.2 | 2.5 | 50.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.