Eman Asim betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 271 | 305 | 27.1 | 88.9 | 8.9 | 49.5 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Eman Asim scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)MEDIUM sample
162 runs off 179 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 90.5 vs 88.9 overall, average 40.5 vs 27.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
160 runs off 166 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 96.4 vs 88.9 overall, average 40.0 vs 27.1 overall.
- Venue: GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen (T20)LOW sample
88 runs off 81 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 108.6 vs 88.9 overall, average 44.0 vs 27.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 87 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 109.2 vs 88.9 overall, average 23.8 vs 27.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
112 runs off 145 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 77.2 vs 88.9 overall, average 37.3 vs 27.1 overall.
- Opposition: Spain (T20)LOW sample
45 runs off 76 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 59.2 vs 88.9 overall, average 22.5 vs 27.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
85 runs off 111 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 76.6 vs 88.9 overall, average 42.5 vs 27.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Spain | T20 | 2 | 45 | 76 | 22.5 | 59.2 | 3.9 | 67.1 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 4 | 55 | 64 | 27.5 | 85.9 | 7.8 | 48.4 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 1 | 58 | 56 | 58.0 | 103.6 | 10.7 | 46.4 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 2 | 45 | 41 | 22.5 | 109.8 | 14.6 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 1 | 29 | 34 | 29.0 | 85.3 | 8.8 | 47.1 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 1 | 39 | 33 | 39.0 | 118.2 | 12.1 | 27.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 4 | 162 | 179 | 40.5 | 90.5 | 9.5 | 50.8 | MEDIUM |
| GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen | T20 | 3 | 88 | 81 | 44.0 | 108.6 | 11.1 | 37.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 271 | 305 | 27.1 | 88.9 | 8.9 | 49.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 9 | 160 | 166 | 40.0 | 96.4 | 10.2 | 45.8 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 85 | 111 | 42.5 | 76.6 | 7.2 | 59.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 10 | 112 | 145 | 37.3 | 77.2 | 6.9 | 51.7 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 95 | 87 | 23.8 | 109.2 | 13.8 | 46.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 64 | 73 | 21.3 | 87.7 | 6.8 | 49.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.