G Voll betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 19 | 604 | 393 | 35.5 | 153.7 | 24.4 | 33.6 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 6 | 336 | 294 | 67.2 | 114.3 | 15.3 | 40.5 | MEDIUM |
| overall | TEST | 2 | 30 | 37 | 15.0 | 81.1 | 16.2 | 70.3 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 10.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where G Voll scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
289 runs off 183 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 157.9 vs 153.7 overall, average 48.2 vs 35.5 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
223 runs off 181 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 123.2 vs 114.3 overall, average 44.6 vs 67.2 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
200 runs off 129 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 155.0 vs 153.7 overall, average 50.0 vs 35.5 overall.
- Opposition: West Indies (T20)LOW sample
164 runs off 97 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 169.1 vs 153.7 overall, average 41.0 vs 35.5 overall.
- Opposition: India (T20)LOW sample
120 runs off 74 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 162.2 vs 153.7 overall, average 30.0 vs 35.5 overall.
- Venue: Arnos Vale Ground, Kingstown, St Vincent (T20)LOW sample
148 runs off 86 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 172.1 vs 153.7 overall, average 49.3 vs 35.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
262 runs off 179 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 146.4 vs 153.7 overall, average 26.2 vs 35.5 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)MEDIUM sample
135 runs off 141 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 95.7 vs 114.3 overall, average 45.0 vs 67.2 overall.
- Venue: Headingley, Leeds (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 60 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 140.0 vs 153.7 overall, average 84.0 vs 35.5 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)LOW sample
113 runs off 113 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 114.3 overall, not yet dismissed vs 67.2 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| India | ODI | 6 | 336 | 294 | 67.2 | 114.3 | 15.3 | 40.5 | MEDIUM |
| New Zealand | T20 | 3 | 161 | 107 | 53.7 | 150.5 | 23.4 | 31.8 | LOW |
| West Indies | T20 | 4 | 164 | 97 | 41.0 | 169.1 | 26.8 | 37.1 | LOW |
| India | T20 | 4 | 120 | 74 | 30.0 | 162.2 | 24.3 | 28.4 | LOW |
| England | T20 | 4 | 58 | 42 | 19.3 | 138.1 | 21.4 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 1 | 45 | 32 | — | 140.6 | 21.9 | 31.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bellerive Oval, Hobart | ODI | 2 | 163 | 134 | 81.5 | 121.6 | 16.4 | 38.1 | MEDIUM |
| Allan Border Field, Brisbane | ODI | 3 | 147 | 130 | 73.5 | 113.1 | 14.6 | 39.2 | MEDIUM |
| Arnos Vale Ground, Kingstown, St Vincent | T20 | 3 | 148 | 86 | 49.3 | 172.1 | 26.7 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Manuka Oval, Canberra | T20 | 2 | 93 | 62 | 93.0 | 150.0 | 21.0 | 25.8 | LOW |
| Headingley, Leeds | T20 | 2 | 84 | 60 | 84.0 | 140.0 | 23.3 | 31.7 | LOW |
| Sky Stadium, Wellington | T20 | 1 | 75 | 57 | 75.0 | 131.6 | 15.8 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Western Australia Cricket Association Ground, Perth | ODI | 1 | 26 | 30 | 26.0 | 86.7 | 13.3 | 56.7 | LOW |
| Eden Park, Auckland | T20 | 1 | 50 | 30 | 50.0 | 166.7 | 30.0 | 26.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 19 | 604 | 393 | 35.5 | 153.7 | 24.4 | 33.6 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 336 | 294 | 67.2 | 114.3 | 15.3 | 40.5 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | TEST | 2 | 30 | 37 | 15.0 | 81.1 | 16.2 | 70.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 19 | 376 | 247 | 34.2 | 152.2 | 27.1 | 40.1 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 6 | 223 | 181 | 44.6 | 123.2 | 14.9 | 31.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 7 | 200 | 129 | 50.0 | 155.0 | 19.4 | 20.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 5 | 113 | 113 | — | 100.0 | 15.9 | 54.9 | LOW |
| new_ball | TEST | 2 | 30 | 37 | 15.0 | 81.1 | 16.2 | 70.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 289 | 183 | 48.2 | 157.9 | 23.5 | 26.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 262 | 179 | 26.2 | 146.4 | 25.1 | 41.3 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 5 | 135 | 141 | 45.0 | 95.7 | 12.8 | 48.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 5 | 132 | 102 | 66.0 | 129.4 | 15.7 | 29.4 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 4 | 69 | 51 | — | 135.3 | 21.6 | 39.2 | LOW |
| PACE | TEST | 2 | 30 | 37 | 15.0 | 81.1 | 16.2 | 70.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 53 | 31 | 53.0 | 171.0 | 25.8 | 32.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.