H Chamto betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 8 | 15 | 31 | 2.5 | 48.4 | 0.0 | 61.3 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 234 | 198 | 4 | 5.1 | 49.5 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Denmark | T20 | 72 | 37 | 2 | 3.1 | 18.5 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 60 | 69 | 0 | 6.9 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 48 | 34 | 0 | 4.3 | — | LOW |
| FB Fields, St Clement | T20 | 42 | 43 | 2 | 6.1 | 21.5 | LOW |
| GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen | T20 | 36 | 26 | 1 | 4.3 | 26.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 8 | 15 | 31 | 2.5 | 48.4 | 0.0 | 61.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 234 | 198 | 4 | 5.1 | 49.5 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 126 | 118 | 3 | 5.6 | 39.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 78 | 53 | 1 | 4.1 | 53.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.