Irfan Khan betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 46 | 766 | 573 | 28.4 | 133.7 | 16.6 | 31.8 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 6 | 48 | 73 | 8.0 | 65.8 | 5.5 | 58.9 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 30 | 51 | 3 | 10.2 | 17.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Irfan Khan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
388 runs off 321 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 120.9 vs 133.7 overall, average 38.8 vs 28.4 overall.
- Venue: Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore (T20)MEDIUM sample
178 runs off 123 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 144.7 vs 133.7 overall, average 35.6 vs 28.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
341 runs off 217 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 157.1 vs 133.7 overall, average 24.4 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: Lahore Qalandars (T20)LOW sample
124 runs off 75 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 165.3 vs 133.7 overall, average 24.8 vs 28.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
248 runs off 200 balls in 31 T20 matches — strike rate 124.0 vs 133.7 overall, average 19.1 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: Islamabad United (T20)LOW sample
120 runs off 93 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 129.0 vs 133.7 overall, average 20.0 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: New Zealand (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 69 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 121.7 vs 133.7 overall, average 28.0 vs 28.4 overall.
- Opposition: Peshawar Zalmi (T20)LOW sample
65 runs off 62 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 104.8 vs 133.7 overall, average 16.3 vs 28.4 overall.
- Venue: Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium (T20)LOW sample
118 runs off 96 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 122.9 vs 133.7 overall, average 23.6 vs 28.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Islamabad United | T20 | 7 | 120 | 93 | 20.0 | 129.0 | 15.1 | 30.1 | LOW |
| Quetta Gladiators | T20 | 5 | 106 | 79 | 35.3 | 134.2 | 13.9 | 26.6 | LOW |
| Lahore Qalandars | T20 | 8 | 124 | 75 | 24.8 | 165.3 | 21.3 | 18.7 | LOW |
| Multan Sultans | T20 | 6 | 99 | 74 | 49.5 | 133.8 | 16.2 | 35.1 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 5 | 84 | 69 | 28.0 | 121.7 | 18.8 | 47.8 | LOW |
| Peshawar Zalmi | T20 | 6 | 65 | 62 | 16.3 | 104.8 | 12.9 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Australia | T20 | 3 | 47 | 38 | 47.0 | 123.7 | 15.8 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Australia | ODI | 1 | 22 | 35 | 22.0 | 62.9 | 5.7 | 54.3 | LOW |
| Rawalpindiz | T20 | 2 | 34 | 30 | 34.0 | 113.3 | 13.3 | 36.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| National Stadium, Karachi | T20 | 19 | 328 | 251 | 29.8 | 130.7 | 15.9 | 30.7 | MEDIUM |
| Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | T20 | 9 | 178 | 123 | 35.6 | 144.7 | 17.1 | 25.2 | MEDIUM |
| Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium | T20 | 8 | 118 | 96 | 23.6 | 122.9 | 13.5 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Melbourne Cricket Ground | ODI | 1 | 22 | 35 | 22.0 | 62.9 | 5.7 | 54.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 38 | 648 | 477 | 29.5 | 135.8 | 17.2 | 31.9 | HIGH |
| Pakistan | T20 | 8 | 118 | 96 | 23.6 | 122.9 | 13.5 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 48 | 73 | 8.0 | 65.8 | 5.5 | 58.9 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 33 | 388 | 321 | 38.8 | 120.9 | 13.1 | 30.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 29 | 341 | 217 | 24.4 | 157.1 | 21.2 | 27.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 3 | 25 | 43 | 12.5 | 58.1 | 7.0 | 62.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 6 | 37 | 35 | 12.3 | 105.7 | 20.0 | 65.7 | LOW |
| death | ODI | 4 | 23 | 30 | 5.8 | 76.7 | 3.3 | 53.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 38 | 449 | 323 | 32.1 | 139.0 | 18.3 | 32.2 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 31 | 248 | 200 | 19.1 | 124.0 | 13.5 | 30.5 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 69 | 50 | — | 138.0 | 18.0 | 34.0 | LOW |
| SPIN | ODI | 3 | 19 | 37 | 9.5 | 51.4 | 5.4 | 64.9 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 5 | 27 | 34 | 6.8 | 79.4 | 5.9 | 55.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.