Juairiya Ferdous betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 22 | 366 | 328 | 17.4 | 111.6 | 16.5 | 50.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Juairiya Ferdous scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Netherlands (T20)LOW sample
85 runs off 66 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 128.8 vs 111.6 overall, average 21.3 vs 17.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
148 runs off 114 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 129.8 vs 111.6 overall, average 21.1 vs 17.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
113 runs off 79 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 143.0 vs 111.6 overall, average 18.8 vs 17.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
190 runs off 184 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 103.3 vs 111.6 overall, average 19.0 vs 17.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
253 runs off 248 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 102.0 vs 111.6 overall, average 18.1 vs 17.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Netherlands | T20 | 4 | 85 | 66 | 21.3 | 128.8 | 21.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 4 | 74 | 56 | 24.7 | 132.1 | 21.4 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 1 | 56 | 45 | 56.0 | 124.4 | 15.6 | 44.4 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 3 | 34 | 37 | 11.3 | 91.9 | 10.8 | 54.1 | LOW |
| India | T20 | 1 | 33 | 30 | 33.0 | 110.0 | 16.7 | 53.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 84 | 79 | 21.0 | 106.3 | 13.9 | 49.4 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 4 | 47 | 47 | 11.8 | 100.0 | 14.9 | 53.2 | LOW |
| Sylhet International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 3 | 60 | 46 | 30.0 | 130.4 | 19.6 | 34.8 | LOW |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 3 | 38 | 37 | 12.7 | 102.7 | 18.9 | 59.5 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 3 | 39 | 35 | 13.0 | 111.4 | 14.3 | 51.4 | LOW |
| Edgbaston, Birmingham | T20 | 1 | 50 | 33 | 50.0 | 151.5 | 27.3 | 51.5 | LOW |
| Old Trafford, Manchester | T20 | 1 | 33 | 30 | 33.0 | 110.0 | 16.7 | 53.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 22 | 366 | 328 | 17.4 | 111.6 | 16.5 | 50.6 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 22 | 253 | 248 | 18.1 | 102.0 | 15.7 | 54.4 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 8 | 113 | 79 | 18.8 | 143.0 | 19.0 | 38.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 17 | 190 | 184 | 19.0 | 103.3 | 12.5 | 48.9 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 148 | 114 | 21.1 | 129.8 | 22.8 | 50.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 28 | 30 | 7.0 | 93.3 | 16.7 | 63.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.