Kamran Ghulam betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 33 | 743 | 579 | 26.5 | 128.3 | 16.2 | 35.6 | HIGH |
| overall | TEST | 6 | 312 | 547 | 28.4 | 57.0 | 7.5 | 72.6 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 7 | 210 | 212 | 30.0 | 99.1 | 13.2 | 52.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 54 | 80 | 1 | 8.9 | 80.0 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 24 | 16 | 1 | 4.0 | 16.0 | LOW |
| overall | TEST | 18 | 16 | 0 | 5.3 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Kamran Ghulam scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: South Africa (TEST)MEDIUM sample
98 runs off 134 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 73.1 vs 57.0 overall, average 24.5 vs 28.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
216 runs off 188 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 114.9 vs 128.3 overall, average 36.0 vs 26.5 overall.
- Opposition: Peshawar Zalmi (T20)LOW sample
98 runs off 63 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 155.6 vs 128.3 overall, average 24.5 vs 26.5 overall.
- Venue: SuperSport Park, Centurion (TEST)LOW sample
58 runs off 78 balls in 1 TEST match — strike rate 74.4 vs 57.0 overall, average 29.0 vs 28.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)LOW sample
108 runs off 100 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 108.0 vs 99.1 overall, average 36.0 vs 30.0 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 61 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 167.2 vs 128.3 overall, average 51.0 vs 26.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Multan Sultans (T20)MEDIUM sample
170 runs off 145 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 117.2 vs 128.3 overall, average 28.3 vs 26.5 overall.
- Opposition: West Indies (TEST)MEDIUM sample
67 runs off 142 balls in 2 TEST matches — strike rate 47.2 vs 57.0 overall, average 16.8 vs 28.4 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
290 runs off 254 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 114.2 vs 128.3 overall, average 24.2 vs 26.5 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
128 runs off 152 balls in 7 ODI matches — strike rate 84.2 vs 99.1 overall, average 25.6 vs 30.0 overall.
- Opposition: Karachi Kings (T20)LOW sample
128 runs off 111 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 115.3 vs 128.3 overall, average 18.3 vs 26.5 overall.
- Phase: new_ball (TEST)LOW sample
34 runs off 74 balls in 4 TEST matches — strike rate 45.9 vs 57.0 overall, average 11.3 vs 28.4 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| England | TEST | 2 | 147 | 271 | 49.0 | 54.2 | 6.3 | 73.4 | MEDIUM |
| Islamabad United | T20 | 8 | 194 | 149 | 27.7 | 130.2 | 18.8 | 40.3 | MEDIUM |
| Multan Sultans | T20 | 7 | 170 | 145 | 28.3 | 117.2 | 13.8 | 35.9 | MEDIUM |
| West Indies | TEST | 2 | 67 | 142 | 16.8 | 47.2 | 5.6 | 72.5 | MEDIUM |
| South Africa | TEST | 2 | 98 | 134 | 24.5 | 73.1 | 11.9 | 70.9 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 120 | 127 | 60.0 | 94.5 | 13.4 | 55.9 | MEDIUM |
| Karachi Kings | T20 | 7 | 128 | 111 | 18.3 | 115.3 | 15.3 | 38.7 | LOW |
| Quetta Gladiators | T20 | 4 | 98 | 75 | 32.7 | 130.7 | 12.0 | 30.7 | LOW |
| Peshawar Zalmi | T20 | 4 | 98 | 63 | 24.5 | 155.6 | 22.2 | 31.7 | LOW |
| South Africa | ODI | 3 | 67 | 47 | 22.3 | 142.6 | 19.1 | 36.2 | LOW |
| Lahore Qalandars | T20 | 2 | 55 | 34 | — | 161.8 | 17.6 | 17.6 | LOW |
| New Zealand | ODI | 1 | 18 | 32 | 18.0 | 56.3 | 3.1 | 59.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Multan Cricket Stadium | TEST | 3 | 211 | 404 | 35.2 | 52.2 | 6.2 | 73.0 | HIGH |
| Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | T20 | 17 | 439 | 348 | 31.4 | 126.1 | 15.5 | 36.2 | HIGH |
| National Stadium, Karachi | T20 | 10 | 221 | 170 | 22.1 | 130.0 | 17.1 | 34.1 | MEDIUM |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | ODI | 2 | 120 | 127 | 60.0 | 94.5 | 13.4 | 55.9 | MEDIUM |
| SuperSport Park, Centurion | TEST | 1 | 58 | 78 | 29.0 | 74.4 | 12.8 | 69.2 | LOW |
| Newlands, Cape Town | TEST | 1 | 40 | 56 | 20.0 | 71.4 | 10.7 | 73.2 | LOW |
| Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium | T20 | 3 | 64 | 46 | 21.3 | 139.1 | 19.6 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | ODI | 1 | 18 | 32 | 18.0 | 56.3 | 3.1 | 59.4 | LOW |
| Newlands, Cape Town | ODI | 1 | 63 | 32 | 63.0 | 196.9 | 28.1 | 18.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | TEST | 5 | 309 | 538 | 30.9 | 57.4 | 7.6 | 72.5 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 30 | 679 | 533 | 27.2 | 127.4 | 15.9 | 35.5 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 7 | 210 | 212 | 30.0 | 99.1 | 13.2 | 52.4 | MEDIUM |
| Pakistan | T20 | 3 | 64 | 46 | 21.3 | 139.1 | 19.6 | 37.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 54 | 80 | 1 | 8.9 | 80.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| old_ball | TEST | 6 | 278 | 473 | 34.8 | 58.8 | 7.8 | 72.5 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 25 | 431 | 334 | 22.7 | 129.0 | 14.7 | 32.6 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 21 | 216 | 188 | 36.0 | 114.9 | 18.1 | 45.7 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 7 | 128 | 152 | 25.6 | 84.2 | 10.5 | 57.2 | MEDIUM |
| new_ball | TEST | 4 | 34 | 74 | 11.3 | 45.9 | 5.4 | 73.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 7 | 96 | 57 | 32.0 | 168.4 | 19.3 | 19.3 | LOW |
| death | ODI | 2 | 71 | 39 | 35.5 | 182.1 | 25.6 | 17.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 48 | 77 | 0 | 9.6 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | TEST | 5 | 162 | 318 | 32.4 | 50.9 | 5.0 | 72.0 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 30 | 351 | 264 | 25.1 | 133.0 | 17.0 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 26 | 290 | 254 | 24.2 | 114.2 | 12.6 | 36.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | TEST | 6 | 139 | 219 | 23.2 | 63.5 | 10.5 | 73.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 7 | 102 | 112 | 25.5 | 91.1 | 12.5 | 56.3 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 5 | 108 | 100 | 36.0 | 108.0 | 14.0 | 48.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 102 | 61 | 51.0 | 167.2 | 27.9 | 42.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.