Kanchan Rana betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 321 | 290 | 26.8 | 110.7 | 10.3 | 37.9 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 186 | 187 | 7 | 6.0 | 26.7 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Kanchan Rana scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
147 runs off 131 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 112.2 vs 110.7 overall, average 36.8 vs 26.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
83 runs off 67 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 123.9 vs 110.7 overall, average 41.5 vs 26.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: FB Fields, St Clement (T20)LOW sample
54 runs off 64 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 84.4 vs 110.7 overall, average 27.0 vs 26.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 91 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 104.4 vs 110.7 overall, average 13.6 vs 26.8 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
107 runs off 113 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 94.7 vs 110.7 overall, average 21.4 vs 26.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 4 | 57 | 58 | 14.3 | 98.3 | 8.6 | 43.1 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 1 | 78 | 58 | 78.0 | 134.5 | 13.8 | 32.8 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 3 | 65 | 49 | 65.0 | 132.7 | 18.4 | 34.7 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 1 | 29 | 36 | 29.0 | 80.6 | 0.0 | 36.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Germany | T20 | 60 | 63 | 2 | 6.3 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 36 | 30 | 3 | 5.0 | 10.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 119 | 103 | 39.7 | 115.5 | 12.6 | 40.8 | LOW |
| FB Fields, St Clement | T20 | 3 | 54 | 64 | 27.0 | 84.4 | 3.1 | 42.2 | LOW |
| GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen | T20 | 2 | 72 | 36 | 72.0 | 200.0 | 30.6 | 19.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 60 | 68 | 0 | 6.8 | — | LOW |
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 36 | 29 | 3 | 4.8 | 9.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 321 | 290 | 26.8 | 110.7 | 10.3 | 37.9 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 186 | 187 | 7 | 6.0 | 26.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 9 | 147 | 131 | 36.8 | 112.2 | 9.2 | 35.1 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 11 | 107 | 113 | 21.4 | 94.7 | 10.6 | 48.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 5 | 67 | 46 | 22.3 | 145.7 | 13.0 | 19.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 72 | 83 | 1 | 6.9 | 83.0 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 72 | 73 | 1 | 6.1 | 73.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 42 | 31 | 5 | 4.4 | 6.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 12 | 143 | 132 | 47.7 | 108.3 | 9.8 | 36.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 10 | 95 | 91 | 13.6 | 104.4 | 8.8 | 41.8 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 83 | 67 | 41.5 | 123.9 | 13.4 | 35.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.