M Mupachikwa betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 49 | 1027 | 1234 | 31.1 | 83.2 | 8.6 | 49.8 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 20 | 473 | 817 | 26.3 | 57.9 | 5.5 | 65.4 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where M Mupachikwa scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: United States of America (ODI)HIGH sample
249 runs off 361 balls in 7 ODI matches — strike rate 69.0 vs 57.9 overall, average 35.6 vs 26.3 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (ODI)HIGH sample
325 runs off 520 balls in 11 ODI matches — strike rate 62.5 vs 57.9 overall, average 36.1 vs 26.3 overall.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)MEDIUM sample
191 runs off 195 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 97.9 vs 83.2 overall, average 27.3 vs 31.1 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
166 runs off 181 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 91.7 vs 83.2 overall, average 55.3 vs 31.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
148 runs off 124 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 119.4 vs 83.2 overall, average 21.1 vs 31.1 overall.
- Opposition: Papua New Guinea (T20)LOW sample
94 runs off 98 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 95.9 vs 83.2 overall, average 94.0 vs 31.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
343 runs off 482 balls in 39 T20 matches — strike rate 71.2 vs 83.2 overall, average 34.3 vs 31.1 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)MEDIUM sample
89 runs off 137 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 65.0 vs 83.2 overall, average 14.8 vs 31.1 overall.
- Venue: Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra (T20)MEDIUM sample
72 runs off 127 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 56.7 vs 83.2 overall, average 24.0 vs 31.1 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 101 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 74.3 vs 83.2 overall, average 37.5 vs 31.1 overall.
- Opposition: Nigeria (T20)LOW sample
62 runs off 83 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 74.7 vs 83.2 overall, average 62.0 vs 31.1 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (ODI)LOW sample
34 runs off 75 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 45.3 vs 57.9 overall, average 11.3 vs 26.3 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| United States of America | ODI | 7 | 249 | 361 | 35.6 | 69.0 | 8.9 | 63.7 | HIGH |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 8 | 191 | 195 | 27.3 | 97.9 | 12.3 | 44.6 | MEDIUM |
| Ireland | ODI | 6 | 103 | 194 | 20.6 | 53.1 | 2.6 | 62.9 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 6 | 166 | 181 | 55.3 | 91.7 | 8.3 | 48.1 | MEDIUM |
| Papua New Guinea | ODI | 2 | 70 | 137 | 70.0 | 51.1 | 3.6 | 65.7 | MEDIUM |
| Uganda | T20 | 6 | 89 | 137 | 14.8 | 65.0 | 5.8 | 57.7 | MEDIUM |
| Thailand | T20 | 4 | 75 | 101 | 37.5 | 74.3 | 5.9 | 52.5 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 4 | 94 | 98 | 94.0 | 95.9 | 10.2 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 2 | 62 | 83 | 62.0 | 74.7 | 10.8 | 61.4 | LOW |
| Thailand | ODI | 3 | 34 | 75 | 11.3 | 45.3 | 2.7 | 72.0 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 5 | 69 | 72 | 13.8 | 95.8 | 12.5 | 45.8 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 2 | 51 | 55 | 51.0 | 92.7 | 12.7 | 50.9 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 1 | 31 | 49 | 31.0 | 63.3 | 6.1 | 59.2 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 3 | 27 | 46 | 9.0 | 58.7 | 2.2 | 52.2 | LOW |
| Botswana | T20 | 1 | 47 | 44 | — | 106.8 | 11.4 | 34.1 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 1 | 22 | 43 | — | 51.2 | 2.3 | 55.8 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 1 | 30 | 40 | — | 75.0 | 2.5 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Sierra Leone | T20 | 1 | 51 | 40 | — | 127.5 | 17.5 | 40.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 11 | 325 | 520 | 36.1 | 62.5 | 6.9 | 64.6 | HIGH |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 5 | 131 | 168 | 43.7 | 78.0 | 6.0 | 47.6 | MEDIUM |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 6 | 117 | 130 | 29.3 | 90.0 | 9.2 | 52.3 | MEDIUM |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 3 | 72 | 127 | 24.0 | 56.7 | 4.7 | 62.2 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 113 | 109 | 56.5 | 103.7 | 14.7 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Civil Service Cricket Club, Stormont, Belfast | ODI | 2 | 58 | 104 | 29.0 | 55.8 | 2.9 | 60.6 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 4 | 87 | 102 | 43.5 | 85.3 | 7.8 | 45.1 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 90 | 96 | 90.0 | 93.8 | 9.4 | 43.8 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 66 | 89 | 66.0 | 74.2 | 4.5 | 44.9 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | ODI | 3 | 34 | 75 | 11.3 | 45.3 | 2.7 | 72.0 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | ODI | 2 | 39 | 68 | 19.5 | 57.4 | 4.4 | 63.2 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | T20 | 1 | 75 | 62 | — | 121.0 | 19.4 | 43.5 | LOW |
| Centre for Cricket Development Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 39 | 59 | 13.0 | 66.1 | 3.4 | 52.5 | LOW |
| Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 3 | 44 | 52 | 44.0 | 84.6 | 7.7 | 51.9 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | T20 | 3 | 27 | 46 | 9.0 | 58.7 | 2.2 | 52.2 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 1 | 36 | 40 | — | 90.0 | 15.0 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 2 | 26 | 37 | 13.0 | 70.3 | 5.4 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 2 | 39 | 35 | 19.5 | 111.4 | 17.1 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Pembroke Cricket Club, Sandymount, Dublin | T20 | 3 | 25 | 32 | 8.3 | 78.1 | 12.5 | 62.5 | LOW |
| Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 27 | 31 | 13.5 | 87.1 | 9.7 | 41.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 46 | 937 | 1138 | 29.3 | 82.3 | 8.5 | 50.3 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 11 | 325 | 520 | 36.1 | 62.5 | 6.9 | 64.6 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 9 | 148 | 297 | 16.4 | 49.8 | 3.0 | 66.7 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 90 | 96 | 90.0 | 93.8 | 9.4 | 43.8 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 35 | 536 | 628 | 33.5 | 85.4 | 8.3 | 47.1 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 39 | 343 | 482 | 34.3 | 71.2 | 8.5 | 58.5 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 13 | 261 | 415 | 23.7 | 62.9 | 5.5 | 60.5 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 18 | 205 | 387 | 34.2 | 53.0 | 5.7 | 70.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 16 | 148 | 124 | 21.1 | 119.4 | 10.5 | 29.0 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | ODI | 19 | 353 | 615 | 27.2 | 57.4 | 5.7 | 66.0 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 40 | 505 | 609 | 25.3 | 82.9 | 7.9 | 47.1 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 41 | 420 | 503 | 35.0 | 83.5 | 10.3 | 54.7 | HIGH |
| PACE | ODI | 15 | 94 | 160 | 23.5 | 58.8 | 5.6 | 65.0 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 102 | 122 | 102.0 | 83.6 | 4.9 | 42.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 4 | 26 | 42 | 26.0 | 61.9 | 2.4 | 57.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.