Raghav Dhawan betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 20 | 539 | 490 | 31.7 | 110.0 | 11.4 | 41.6 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 26 | 1 | 13.0 | 26.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Raghav Dhawan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
318 runs off 261 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 121.8 vs 110.0 overall, average 45.4 vs 31.7 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
166 runs off 163 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 101.8 vs 110.0 overall, average 41.5 vs 31.7 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
270 runs off 237 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 113.9 vs 110.0 overall, average 45.0 vs 31.7 overall.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 80 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 125.0 vs 110.0 overall, average 50.0 vs 31.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
238 runs off 234 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 101.7 vs 110.0 overall, average 29.8 vs 31.7 overall.
- Opposition: Kenya (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 84 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 86.9 vs 110.0 overall, average 36.5 vs 31.7 overall.
- Venue: Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 83 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 92.8 vs 110.0 overall, average 12.8 vs 31.7 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 66 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 83.3 vs 110.0 overall, average 9.2 vs 31.7 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Nigeria | T20 | 5 | 99 | 92 | 24.8 | 107.6 | 9.8 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 2 | 73 | 84 | 36.5 | 86.9 | 4.8 | 47.6 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 2 | 100 | 80 | 50.0 | 125.0 | 11.3 | 32.5 | LOW |
| Botswana | T20 | 3 | 61 | 53 | 30.5 | 115.1 | 17.0 | 45.3 | LOW |
| Malawi | T20 | 1 | 50 | 45 | — | 111.1 | 6.7 | 37.8 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 3 | 40 | 42 | 13.3 | 95.2 | 9.5 | 42.9 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 2 | 48 | 38 | 24.0 | 126.3 | 18.4 | 42.1 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 1 | 39 | 37 | 39.0 | 105.4 | 16.2 | 48.6 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 6 | 228 | 211 | 38.0 | 108.1 | 8.1 | 38.4 | MEDIUM |
| Takashinga Sports Club, Highfield, Harare | T20 | 4 | 157 | 139 | 78.5 | 112.9 | 13.7 | 41.7 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 7 | 77 | 83 | 12.8 | 92.8 | 9.6 | 51.8 | LOW |
| Jinja Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 48 | 38 | 24.0 | 126.3 | 18.4 | 42.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 19 | 510 | 471 | 31.9 | 108.3 | 10.8 | 42.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 19 | 270 | 237 | 45.0 | 113.9 | 16.0 | 48.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 14 | 238 | 234 | 29.8 | 101.7 | 6.4 | 35.9 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 318 | 261 | 45.4 | 121.8 | 13.4 | 38.7 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 14 | 166 | 163 | 41.5 | 101.8 | 11.0 | 45.4 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 55 | 66 | 9.2 | 83.3 | 4.5 | 43.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.