RK Singh betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 86 | 1929 | 1261 | 36.4 | 153.0 | 20.6 | 31.5 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 2 | 55 | 41 | 27.5 | 134.1 | 19.5 | 39.0 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 16 | 19 | 3 | 7.1 | 6.3 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where RK Singh scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
1209 runs off 709 balls in 76 T20 matches — strike rate 170.5 vs 153.0 overall, average 37.8 vs 36.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)HIGH sample
1155 runs off 597 balls in 62 T20 matches — strike rate 193.5 vs 153.0 overall, average 38.5 vs 36.4 overall.
- Opposition: Sunrisers Hyderabad (T20)MEDIUM sample
230 runs off 145 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 158.6 vs 153.0 overall, average 46.0 vs 36.4 overall.
- Opposition: Lucknow Super Giants (T20)MEDIUM sample
258 runs off 143 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 180.4 vs 153.0 overall, average 64.5 vs 36.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
217 runs off 136 balls in 24 T20 matches — strike rate 159.6 vs 153.0 overall, average 54.3 vs 36.4 overall.
- Opposition: Rajasthan Royals (T20)LOW sample
150 runs off 90 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 166.7 vs 153.0 overall, average 150.0 vs 36.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
503 runs off 416 balls in 63 T20 matches — strike rate 120.9 vs 153.0 overall, average 29.6 vs 36.4 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
683 runs off 600 balls in 58 T20 matches — strike rate 113.8 vs 153.0 overall, average 32.5 vs 36.4 overall.
- Opposition: Chennai Super Kings (T20)LOW sample
146 runs off 117 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 124.8 vs 153.0 overall, average 36.5 vs 36.4 overall.
- Opposition: Mumbai Indians (T20)LOW sample
129 runs off 96 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 134.4 vs 153.0 overall, average 32.3 vs 36.4 overall.
- Opposition: Gujarat Titans (T20)LOW sample
120 runs off 85 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 141.2 vs 153.0 overall, average 30.0 vs 36.4 overall.
- Opposition: South Africa (T20)LOW sample
110 runs off 85 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 129.4 vs 153.0 overall, average 22.0 vs 36.4 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Sunrisers Hyderabad | T20 | 8 | 230 | 145 | 46.0 | 158.6 | 20.7 | 26.2 | MEDIUM |
| Lucknow Super Giants | T20 | 7 | 258 | 143 | 64.5 | 180.4 | 27.3 | 28.7 | MEDIUM |
| Chennai Super Kings | T20 | 6 | 146 | 117 | 36.5 | 124.8 | 15.4 | 39.3 | LOW |
| Mumbai Indians | T20 | 7 | 129 | 96 | 32.3 | 134.4 | 17.7 | 35.4 | LOW |
| Rajasthan Royals | T20 | 5 | 150 | 90 | 150.0 | 166.7 | 23.3 | 24.4 | LOW |
| Gujarat Titans | T20 | 5 | 120 | 85 | 30.0 | 141.2 | 17.6 | 37.6 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 6 | 110 | 85 | 22.0 | 129.4 | 16.5 | 32.9 | LOW |
| Delhi Capitals | T20 | 6 | 102 | 68 | 17.0 | 150.0 | 19.1 | 30.9 | LOW |
| Royal Challengers Bengaluru | T20 | 4 | 90 | 60 | 45.0 | 150.0 | 15.0 | 21.7 | LOW |
| Australia | T20 | 4 | 105 | 59 | 52.5 | 178.0 | 28.8 | 23.7 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 3 | 91 | 57 | 91.0 | 159.6 | 22.8 | 35.1 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 6 | 97 | 56 | 32.3 | 173.2 | 21.4 | 35.7 | LOW |
| South Africa | ODI | 2 | 55 | 41 | 27.5 | 134.1 | 19.5 | 39.0 | LOW |
| Royal Challengers Bangalore | T20 | 2 | 64 | 41 | 64.0 | 156.1 | 19.5 | 29.3 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 2 | 61 | 32 | 61.0 | 190.6 | 28.1 | 15.6 | LOW |
| England | T20 | 2 | 39 | 32 | 19.5 | 121.9 | 18.8 | 43.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | T20 | 24 | 611 | 382 | 43.6 | 159.9 | 21.7 | 28.8 | HIGH |
| Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 8 | 157 | 119 | 26.2 | 131.9 | 17.6 | 31.1 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 4 | 84 | 78 | 28.0 | 107.7 | 11.5 | 42.3 | LOW |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | T20 | 5 | 105 | 74 | 21.0 | 141.9 | 18.9 | 32.4 | LOW |
| Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow | T20 | 2 | 103 | 63 | 103.0 | 163.5 | 23.8 | 30.2 | LOW |
| Dr DY Patil Sports Academy, Mumbai | T20 | 3 | 98 | 62 | 49.0 | 158.1 | 22.6 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium, Raipur | T20 | 2 | 95 | 58 | 95.0 | 163.8 | 19.0 | 20.7 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 6 | 97 | 56 | 32.3 | 173.2 | 21.4 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Dr. Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy ACA-VDCA Cricket Stadium, Visakhapatnam | T20 | 3 | 87 | 50 | 43.5 | 174.0 | 26.0 | 32.0 | LOW |
| St George's Park, Gqeberha | T20 | 2 | 77 | 50 | 77.0 | 154.0 | 22.0 | 22.0 | LOW |
| Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad | T20 | 3 | 76 | 49 | 76.0 | 155.1 | 18.4 | 22.4 | LOW |
| Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium, Pune | T20 | 3 | 41 | 42 | 13.7 | 97.6 | 11.9 | 45.2 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 80 | 1832 | 1205 | 36.6 | 152.0 | 20.6 | 31.3 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 6 | 97 | 56 | 32.3 | 173.2 | 21.4 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Unknown | ODI | 2 | 55 | 41 | 27.5 | 134.1 | 19.5 | 39.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 58 | 683 | 600 | 32.5 | 113.8 | 11.5 | 32.3 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 62 | 1155 | 597 | 38.5 | 193.5 | 29.3 | 28.6 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 91 | 64 | 45.5 | 142.2 | 25.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 76 | 1209 | 709 | 37.8 | 170.5 | 25.7 | 32.4 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 63 | 503 | 416 | 29.6 | 120.9 | 12.5 | 30.3 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 24 | 217 | 136 | 54.3 | 159.6 | 19.1 | 30.1 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.