V Suryavanshi betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 29 | 1221 | 549 | 42.1 | 222.4 | 37.7 | 33.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where V Suryavanshi scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
810 runs off 364 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 222.5 vs 222.4 overall, average 54.0 vs 42.1 overall.
- Venue: Sawai Mansingh Stadium, Jaipur (T20)MEDIUM sample
411 runs off 168 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 244.6 vs 222.4 overall, average 51.4 vs 42.1 overall.
- Opposition: Gujarat Titans (T20)LOW sample
264 runs off 119 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 221.8 vs 222.4 overall, average 66.0 vs 42.1 overall.
- Opposition: Sunrisers Hyderabad (T20)LOW sample
200 runs off 66 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 303.0 vs 222.4 overall, average 66.7 vs 42.1 overall.
- Venue: Maharaja Yadavindra Singh International Cricket Stadium, New Chandigarh (T20)LOW sample
236 runs off 91 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 259.3 vs 222.4 overall, average 78.7 vs 42.1 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
154 runs off 62 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 248.4 vs 222.4 overall, average 77.0 vs 42.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
382 runs off 175 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 218.3 vs 222.4 overall, average 29.4 vs 42.1 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)LOW sample
151 runs off 77 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 196.1 vs 222.4 overall, average 50.3 vs 42.1 overall.
- Opposition: Lucknow Super Giants (T20)LOW sample
135 runs off 69 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 195.7 vs 222.4 overall, average 45.0 vs 42.1 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
151 runs off 77 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 196.1 vs 222.4 overall, average 50.3 vs 42.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
206 runs off 108 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 190.7 vs 222.4 overall, average 25.8 vs 42.1 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Gujarat Titans | T20 | 4 | 264 | 119 | 66.0 | 221.8 | 37.8 | 32.8 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 151 | 77 | 50.3 | 196.1 | 31.2 | 28.6 | LOW |
| Lucknow Super Giants | T20 | 3 | 135 | 69 | 45.0 | 195.7 | 34.8 | 46.4 | LOW |
| Sunrisers Hyderabad | T20 | 3 | 200 | 66 | 66.7 | 303.0 | 51.5 | 27.3 | LOW |
| Chennai Super Kings | T20 | 2 | 109 | 49 | 54.5 | 222.4 | 34.7 | 20.4 | LOW |
| Royal Challengers Bengaluru | T20 | 2 | 94 | 38 | 47.0 | 247.4 | 44.7 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Punjab Kings | T20 | 2 | 83 | 31 | 41.5 | 267.7 | 51.6 | 45.2 | LOW |
| Kolkata Knight Riders | T20 | 2 | 50 | 30 | 25.0 | 166.7 | 30.0 | 36.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sawai Mansingh Stadium, Jaipur | T20 | 8 | 411 | 168 | 51.4 | 244.6 | 42.9 | 36.3 | MEDIUM |
| Maharaja Yadavindra Singh International Cricket Stadium, New Chandigarh | T20 | 3 | 236 | 91 | 78.7 | 259.3 | 44.0 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 151 | 77 | 50.3 | 196.1 | 31.2 | 28.6 | LOW |
| Barsapara Cricket Stadium, Guwahati | T20 | 3 | 169 | 57 | 56.3 | 296.5 | 52.6 | 21.1 | LOW |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | T20 | 2 | 103 | 53 | 51.5 | 194.3 | 30.2 | 24.5 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | T20 | 2 | 50 | 30 | 25.0 | 166.7 | 30.0 | 36.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 26 | 1070 | 472 | 41.2 | 226.7 | 38.8 | 34.5 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 151 | 77 | 50.3 | 196.1 | 31.2 | 28.6 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 29 | 810 | 364 | 54.0 | 222.5 | 39.6 | 37.9 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 14 | 382 | 175 | 29.4 | 218.3 | 33.1 | 25.1 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 861 | 379 | 45.3 | 227.2 | 39.3 | 34.6 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 14 | 206 | 108 | 25.8 | 190.7 | 28.7 | 31.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 154 | 62 | 77.0 | 248.4 | 43.5 | 32.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.