£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

A Aikenhead betting stats, splits & projections

Batter

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT201932432920.398.510.945.3HIGH

Why we like it

Splits where A Aikenhead scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Opposition: Guernsey (T20)LOW sample

    110 runs off 80 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 137.5 vs 98.5 overall, average 36.7 vs 20.3 overall.

  • Opposition: Sweden (T20)LOW sample

    71 runs off 61 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 116.4 vs 98.5 overall, average 71.0 vs 20.3 overall.

  • Venue: Grainville, St Saviour (T20)LOW sample

    110 runs off 80 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 137.5 vs 98.5 overall, average 36.7 vs 20.3 overall.

  • Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample

    119 runs off 93 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 128.0 vs 98.5 overall, average 19.8 vs 20.3 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample

    158 runs off 176 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 89.8 vs 98.5 overall, average 26.3 vs 20.3 overall.

  • Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample

    47 runs off 60 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 78.3 vs 98.5 overall, average 11.8 vs 20.3 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

GuernseyT2031108036.7137.520.035.0LOW
SwedenT202716171.0116.414.842.6LOW
GibraltarT202373918.594.97.746.2LOW
ItalyT202303915.076.95.151.3LOW
SpainT2013233—97.012.142.4LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

Grainville, St SaviourT2031108036.7137.520.035.0LOW
Simar Cricket Ground, RomeT2026967—103.013.444.8LOW
Bayer Uerdingen Cricket GroundT203344811.370.82.150.0LOW
Roma Cricket GroundT203414320.595.311.644.2LOW
Europa Sports ComplexT202373918.594.97.746.2LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT201932432920.398.510.945.3HIGH

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

powerplayT201618219718.292.49.647.2MEDIUM
middleT20810210525.597.110.544.8LOW

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET201315817626.389.810.249.4MEDIUM
UNKNOWNT20111199319.8128.015.136.6LOW
SPINT209476011.878.36.746.7LOW

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.