A Akurut betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 6 | 14 | 26 | 3.5 | 53.8 | 3.8 | 73.1 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 127 | 105 | 8 | 5.0 | 13.1 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Namibia | T20 | 41 | 46 | 2 | 6.7 | 23.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 59 | 68 | 3 | 6.9 | 22.7 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 44 | 17 | 3 | 2.3 | 5.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 127 | 105 | 8 | 5.0 | 13.1 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 92 | 78 | 5 | 5.1 | 15.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.