A Chenthamara betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 2 | 3 | 12 | — | 25.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 184 | 218 | 14 | 7.1 | 15.6 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Hong Kong | T20 | 71 | 88 | 4 | 7.4 | 22.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 51 | 70 | 5 | 8.2 | 14.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 116 | 151 | 10 | 7.8 | 15.1 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 68 | 67 | 4 | 5.9 | 16.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 184 | 218 | 14 | 7.1 | 15.6 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 72 | 83 | 4 | 6.9 | 20.8 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 58 | 62 | 8 | 6.4 | 7.8 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 54 | 73 | 2 | 8.1 | 36.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.