A Dizija betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 33 | 702 | 629 | 22.6 | 111.6 | 14.6 | 46.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 61 | 128 | 2 | 12.6 | 64.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where A Dizija scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Bulgaria (T20)MEDIUM sample
246 runs off 183 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 134.4 vs 111.6 overall, average 30.8 vs 22.6 overall.
- Venue: National Sports Academy, Sofia (T20)MEDIUM sample
290 runs off 182 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 159.3 vs 111.6 overall, average 48.3 vs 22.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
175 runs off 131 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 133.6 vs 111.6 overall, average 21.9 vs 22.6 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
340 runs off 233 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 145.9 vs 111.6 overall, average 28.3 vs 22.6 overall.
- Venue: Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
128 runs off 93 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 137.6 vs 111.6 overall, average 42.7 vs 22.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
422 runs off 410 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 102.9 vs 111.6 overall, average 24.8 vs 22.6 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
334 runs off 376 balls in 32 T20 matches — strike rate 88.8 vs 111.6 overall, average 20.9 vs 22.6 overall.
- Opposition: Cyprus (T20)LOW sample
98 runs off 99 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 99.0 vs 111.6 overall, average 32.7 vs 22.6 overall.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)LOW sample
56 runs off 64 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 87.5 vs 111.6 overall, average 28.0 vs 22.6 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 72 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 111.6 overall, average 36.0 vs 22.6 overall.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
56 runs off 64 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 87.5 vs 111.6 overall, average 28.0 vs 22.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Bulgaria | T20 | 8 | 246 | 183 | 30.8 | 134.4 | 21.9 | 44.3 | MEDIUM |
| Cyprus | T20 | 3 | 98 | 99 | 32.7 | 99.0 | 7.1 | 46.5 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 56 | 64 | 28.0 | 87.5 | 10.9 | 45.3 | LOW |
| Slovenia | T20 | 2 | 95 | 59 | 95.0 | 161.0 | 27.1 | 39.0 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 2 | 95 | 58 | 47.5 | 163.8 | 19.0 | 25.9 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 2 | 31 | 37 | 15.5 | 83.8 | 8.1 | 51.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Gibraltar | T20 | 37 | 49 | 2 | 7.9 | 24.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 6 | 290 | 182 | 48.3 | 159.3 | 25.3 | 35.2 | MEDIUM |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 128 | 93 | 42.7 | 137.6 | 21.5 | 44.1 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 72 | 72 | 36.0 | 100.0 | 6.9 | 44.4 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 2 | 56 | 64 | 28.0 | 87.5 | 10.9 | 45.3 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 28 | 51 | 9.3 | 54.9 | 3.9 | 68.6 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 3 | 47 | 45 | 15.7 | 104.4 | 8.9 | 46.7 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 19 | 35 | 6.3 | 54.3 | 2.9 | 57.1 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 34 | 32 | 11.3 | 106.3 | 12.5 | 46.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 37 | 49 | 2 | 7.9 | 24.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 33 | 702 | 629 | 22.6 | 111.6 | 14.6 | 46.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 61 | 128 | 2 | 12.6 | 64.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 32 | 334 | 376 | 20.9 | 88.8 | 11.4 | 54.8 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 16 | 340 | 233 | 28.3 | 145.9 | 19.3 | 34.3 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 61 | 128 | 2 | 12.6 | 64.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 422 | 410 | 24.8 | 102.9 | 13.2 | 49.0 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 175 | 131 | 21.9 | 133.6 | 19.1 | 40.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 105 | 88 | 17.5 | 119.3 | 14.8 | 45.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.