A Kirschbaum betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 25 | 415 | 408 | 20.8 | 101.7 | 9.1 | 40.9 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 522 | 484 | 29 | 5.6 | 16.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where A Kirschbaum scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands (T20)MEDIUM sample
159 runs off 136 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 116.9 vs 101.7 overall, average 31.8 vs 20.8 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
120 runs off 124 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 96.8 vs 101.7 overall, average 30.0 vs 20.8 overall.
- Opposition: Mexico (T20)LOW sample
119 runs off 96 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 124.0 vs 101.7 overall, average 39.7 vs 20.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 66 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 139.4 vs 101.7 overall, average 30.7 vs 20.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
203 runs off 218 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 93.1 vs 101.7 overall, average 15.6 vs 20.8 overall.
- Venue: St Albans Club, Buenos Aires (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 104 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 89.4 vs 101.7 overall, average 23.3 vs 20.8 overall.
- Venue: Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 60 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 91.7 vs 101.7 overall, average 13.8 vs 20.8 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
87 runs off 109 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 79.8 vs 101.7 overall, average 21.8 vs 20.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Mexico | T20 | 5 | 119 | 96 | 39.7 | 124.0 | 10.4 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 4 | 91 | 86 | 22.8 | 105.8 | 11.6 | 43.0 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 4 | 60 | 60 | 20.0 | 100.0 | 10.0 | 41.7 | LOW |
| Bermuda | T20 | 4 | 33 | 53 | 8.3 | 62.3 | 5.7 | 54.7 | LOW |
| Suriname | T20 | 3 | 32 | 35 | 10.7 | 91.4 | 14.3 | 54.3 | LOW |
| Panama | T20 | 2 | 39 | 34 | 39.0 | 114.7 | 5.9 | 29.4 | LOW |
| Bahamas | T20 | 2 | 32 | 33 | 32.0 | 97.0 | 3.0 | 39.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Brazil | T20 | 96 | 75 | 7 | 4.7 | 10.7 | LOW |
| Bermuda | T20 | 90 | 149 | 2 | 9.9 | 74.5 | LOW |
| Mexico | T20 | 84 | 55 | 7 | 3.9 | 7.9 | LOW |
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 72 | 46 | 2 | 3.8 | 23.0 | LOW |
| Suriname | T20 | 72 | 58 | 5 | 4.8 | 11.6 | LOW |
| Panama | T20 | 42 | 41 | 1 | 5.9 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Bahamas | T20 | 36 | 42 | 2 | 7.0 | 21.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands | T20 | 6 | 159 | 136 | 31.8 | 116.9 | 10.3 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 6 | 93 | 104 | 23.3 | 89.4 | 6.7 | 44.2 | LOW |
| Hurlingham Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 5 | 66 | 64 | 16.5 | 103.1 | 7.8 | 43.8 | LOW |
| Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 4 | 55 | 60 | 13.8 | 91.7 | 11.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 144 | 114 | 9 | 4.8 | 12.7 | LOW |
| Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands | T20 | 102 | 65 | 5 | 3.8 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Belgrano Athletic Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 96 | 113 | 3 | 7.1 | 37.7 | LOW |
| Hurlingham Club Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 96 | 128 | 5 | 8.0 | 25.6 | LOW |
| St George's College Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 48 | 38 | 5 | 4.8 | 7.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 25 | 415 | 408 | 20.8 | 101.7 | 9.1 | 40.9 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 522 | 484 | 29 | 5.6 | 16.7 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 19 | 245 | 244 | 17.5 | 100.4 | 7.8 | 39.8 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 14 | 87 | 109 | 21.8 | 79.8 | 9.2 | 54.1 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 5 | 83 | 55 | 41.5 | 150.9 | 14.5 | 20.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 318 | 321 | 19 | 6.1 | 16.9 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 174 | 133 | 8 | 4.6 | 16.6 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 20 | 203 | 218 | 15.6 | 93.1 | 6.9 | 43.1 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 120 | 124 | 30.0 | 96.8 | 8.1 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 92 | 66 | 30.7 | 139.4 | 18.2 | 33.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.