AA Senn betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 20 | 422 | 469 | 24.8 | 90.0 | 6.8 | 40.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 24 | 15 | 2 | 3.8 | 7.5 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where AA Senn scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample
101 runs off 101 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 90.0 overall, average 33.7 vs 24.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 119 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 75.6 vs 90.0 overall, average 18.0 vs 24.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Croatia | T20 | 5 | 99 | 108 | 33.0 | 91.7 | 8.3 | 36.1 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 4 | 96 | 107 | 24.0 | 89.7 | 5.6 | 38.3 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 4 | 101 | 101 | 33.7 | 100.0 | 7.9 | 37.6 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 1 | 32 | 47 | 32.0 | 68.1 | 6.4 | 51.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 9 | 200 | 231 | 22.2 | 86.6 | 6.5 | 44.2 | MEDIUM |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 7 | 163 | 167 | 32.6 | 97.6 | 6.6 | 35.3 | MEDIUM |
| Mladost Cricket Ground, Zagreb | T20 | 4 | 59 | 71 | 19.7 | 83.1 | 8.5 | 40.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 20 | 422 | 469 | 24.8 | 90.0 | 6.8 | 40.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 14 | 198 | 232 | 28.3 | 85.3 | 4.3 | 37.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 20 | 158 | 179 | 26.3 | 88.3 | 8.4 | 46.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 7 | 66 | 58 | 16.5 | 113.8 | 12.1 | 34.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 260 | 275 | 26.0 | 94.5 | 8.0 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 90 | 119 | 18.0 | 75.6 | 3.4 | 43.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 72 | 75 | 36.0 | 96.0 | 8.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.