Adil Butt betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 872 | 492 | 39.6 | 177.2 | 29.7 | 41.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 462 | 641 | 30 | 8.3 | 21.4 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Adil Butt scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
613 runs off 339 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 180.8 vs 177.2 overall, average 55.7 vs 39.6 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
603 runs off 315 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 191.4 vs 177.2 overall, average 43.1 vs 39.6 overall.
- Opposition: Mozambique (T20)MEDIUM sample
393 runs off 164 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 239.6 vs 177.2 overall, average 43.7 vs 39.6 overall.
- Venue: Malkerns Country Club oval (T20)MEDIUM sample
483 runs off 217 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 222.6 vs 177.2 overall, average 53.7 vs 39.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
180 runs off 83 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 216.9 vs 177.2 overall, average 25.7 vs 39.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
202 runs off 145 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 139.3 vs 177.2 overall, average 25.3 vs 39.6 overall.
- Opposition: Nigeria (T20)LOW sample
138 runs off 97 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 142.3 vs 177.2 overall, average 138.0 vs 39.6 overall.
- Venue: Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 62 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 150.0 vs 177.2 overall, average 23.3 vs 39.6 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
79 runs off 70 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 112.9 vs 177.2 overall, average 19.8 vs 39.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Mozambique | T20 | 9 | 393 | 164 | 43.7 | 239.6 | 42.7 | 38.4 | MEDIUM |
| Nigeria | T20 | 2 | 138 | 97 | 138.0 | 142.3 | 23.7 | 45.4 | LOW |
| Lesotho | T20 | 2 | 111 | 65 | 111.0 | 170.8 | 26.2 | 32.3 | LOW |
| St Helena | T20 | 2 | 88 | 55 | 44.0 | 160.0 | 21.8 | 34.5 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 2 | 34 | 34 | 17.0 | 100.0 | 11.8 | 47.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Mozambique | T20 | 162 | 267 | 9 | 9.9 | 29.7 | MEDIUM |
| Tanzania | T20 | 48 | 67 | 4 | 8.4 | 16.8 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 42 | 82 | 3 | 11.7 | 27.3 | LOW |
| St Helena | T20 | 42 | 46 | 2 | 6.6 | 23.0 | LOW |
| Sierra Leone | T20 | 36 | 49 | 4 | 8.2 | 12.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Malkerns Country Club oval | T20 | 10 | 483 | 217 | 53.7 | 222.6 | 38.2 | 36.4 | MEDIUM |
| Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre | T20 | 4 | 93 | 62 | 23.3 | 150.0 | 27.4 | 41.9 | LOW |
| Nigeria Cricket Federation Oval 1, Abuja | T20 | 1 | 88 | 58 | — | 151.7 | 24.1 | 46.6 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School B Field, Accra | T20 | 3 | 59 | 47 | 19.7 | 125.5 | 23.4 | 53.2 | LOW |
| University of Lagos Cricket Oval | T20 | 1 | 81 | 43 | 81.0 | 188.4 | 27.9 | 32.6 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 1 | 31 | 30 | 31.0 | 103.3 | 13.3 | 46.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Malkerns Country Club oval | T20 | 168 | 272 | 14 | 9.7 | 19.4 | MEDIUM |
| Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre | T20 | 84 | 99 | 5 | 7.1 | 19.8 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School B Field, Accra | T20 | 54 | 73 | 3 | 8.1 | 24.3 | LOW |
| Nigeria Cricket Federation Oval 2, Abuja | T20 | 48 | 53 | 3 | 6.6 | 17.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 872 | 492 | 39.6 | 177.2 | 29.7 | 41.1 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 462 | 641 | 30 | 8.3 | 21.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 23 | 603 | 315 | 43.1 | 191.4 | 33.0 | 42.2 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 10 | 202 | 145 | 25.3 | 139.3 | 21.4 | 40.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 2 | 67 | 32 | — | 209.4 | 34.4 | 34.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 228 | 320 | 8 | 8.4 | 40.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 132 | 194 | 16 | 8.8 | 12.1 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 102 | 127 | 6 | 7.5 | 21.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 23 | 613 | 339 | 55.7 | 180.8 | 30.7 | 39.8 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 180 | 83 | 25.7 | 216.9 | 38.6 | 44.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 79 | 70 | 19.8 | 112.9 | 14.3 | 42.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.