AJ Mosca betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 20 | 539 | 413 | 35.9 | 130.5 | 14.8 | 32.4 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where AJ Mosca scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
283 runs off 211 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 134.1 vs 130.5 overall, average 70.8 vs 35.9 overall.
- Venue: 7he Sevens Stadium, Dubai (T20)LOW sample
115 runs off 79 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 145.6 vs 130.5 overall, average 38.3 vs 35.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
166 runs off 145 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 114.5 vs 130.5 overall, average 20.8 vs 35.9 overall.
- Venue: Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh (T20)LOW sample
107 runs off 90 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 118.9 vs 130.5 overall, average 53.5 vs 35.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Ireland | T20 | 4 | 134 | 97 | 33.5 | 138.1 | 18.6 | 37.1 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 70 | 51 | — | 137.3 | 11.8 | 19.6 | LOW |
| Croatia | T20 | 1 | 78 | 49 | 78.0 | 159.2 | 18.4 | 22.4 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 2 | 40 | 40 | 40.0 | 100.0 | 10.0 | 35.0 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 1 | 26 | 32 | 26.0 | 81.3 | 6.3 | 43.8 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 1 | 62 | 32 | — | 193.8 | 28.1 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 1 | 29 | 30 | 29.0 | 96.7 | 6.7 | 26.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 3 | 107 | 90 | 53.5 | 118.9 | 10.0 | 25.6 | LOW |
| 7he Sevens Stadium, Dubai | T20 | 3 | 115 | 79 | 38.3 | 145.6 | 19.0 | 35.4 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 88 | 58 | 44.0 | 151.7 | 17.2 | 22.4 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 2 | 57 | 50 | 28.5 | 114.0 | 12.0 | 36.0 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 30 | 32 | 30.0 | 93.8 | 9.4 | 40.6 | LOW |
| Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 1 | 62 | 32 | — | 193.8 | 28.1 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 2 | 31 | 30 | 15.5 | 103.3 | 10.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 20 | 539 | 413 | 35.9 | 130.5 | 14.8 | 32.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 13 | 295 | 215 | 42.1 | 137.2 | 12.6 | 22.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 16 | 213 | 163 | 42.6 | 130.7 | 19.0 | 44.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 6 | 31 | 35 | 10.3 | 88.6 | 8.6 | 40.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 20 | 283 | 211 | 70.8 | 134.1 | 16.1 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 166 | 145 | 20.8 | 114.5 | 11.0 | 31.7 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 5 | 90 | 57 | 30.0 | 157.9 | 19.3 | 29.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.