Alina Aslam betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 14 | 87 | 147 | 9.7 | 59.2 | 0.7 | 55.1 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 467 | 426 | 19 | 5.5 | 22.4 | HIGH |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Denmark | T20 | 3 | 18 | 39 | 9.0 | 46.2 | 0.0 | 64.1 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 2 | 15 | 30 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Luxembourg | T20 | 66 | 59 | 3 | 5.4 | 19.7 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 66 | 71 | 2 | 6.5 | 35.5 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 65 | 55 | 4 | 5.1 | 13.8 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 48 | 38 | 2 | 4.8 | 19.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 2 | 16 | 36 | 8.0 | 44.4 | 0.0 | 63.9 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 3 | 23 | 33 | 23.0 | 69.7 | 3.0 | 45.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 144 | 126 | 8 | 5.3 | 15.8 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 66 | 74 | 3 | 6.7 | 24.7 | LOW |
| Ekeberg Cricket Ground 1, Oslo | T20 | 66 | 50 | 1 | 4.5 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 66 | 71 | 2 | 6.5 | 35.5 | LOW |
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 41 | 31 | 2 | 4.5 | 15.5 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 36 | 39 | 0 | 6.5 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 14 | 87 | 147 | 9.7 | 59.2 | 0.7 | 55.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 467 | 426 | 19 | 5.5 | 22.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 9 | 49 | 92 | 8.2 | 53.3 | 0.0 | 58.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 7 | 37 | 53 | 18.5 | 69.8 | 1.9 | 47.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 300 | 266 | 12 | 5.3 | 22.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 90 | 79 | 4 | 5.3 | 19.8 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 77 | 81 | 3 | 6.3 | 27.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 11 | 69 | 109 | 11.5 | 63.3 | 0.9 | 54.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.