£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

AM Zepeda betting stats, splits & projections

Batter

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT201232729654.5110.513.942.6MEDIUM
overallT20252199124.716.6MEDIUM

Why we like it

Splits where AM Zepeda scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Opposition: Switzerland (T20)LOW sample

    77 runs off 60 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 128.3 vs 110.5 overall, average 77.0 vs 54.5 overall.

  • Venue: Pierre Werner Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample

    85 runs off 70 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 121.4 vs 110.5 overall, average 42.5 vs 54.5 overall.

  • Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample

    97 runs off 73 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 132.9 vs 110.5 overall, average 97.0 vs 54.5 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)MEDIUM sample

    179 runs off 181 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 98.9 vs 110.5 overall, average 179.0 vs 54.5 overall.

  • Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample

    209 runs off 208 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 100.5 vs 110.5 overall, average 69.7 vs 54.5 overall.

  • Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample

    83 runs off 87 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 95.4 vs 110.5 overall, average 41.5 vs 54.5 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

SwitzerlandT201776077.0128.315.040.0LOW
TurkeyT2015251—102.09.837.3LOW
BulgariaT2014047—85.117.063.8LOW
Czech RepublicT2023836—105.611.141.7LOW
LuxembourgT202433221.5134.415.634.4LOW
NorwayT202333033.0110.016.746.7LOW

Bowling

Czech RepublicT20482052.54.0LOW
NorwayT20421942.74.8LOW
LuxembourgT20363125.215.5LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov CountyT206179181179.098.912.744.2MEDIUM
Pierre Werner Cricket GroundT202857042.5121.412.941.4LOW

Bowling

Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov CountyT201268664.114.3LOW
Scott Page Field, VinorT20482833.59.3LOW
Pierre Werner Cricket GroundT20364417.344.0LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT201232729654.5110.513.942.6MEDIUM

Bowling

UnknownT20252199124.716.6MEDIUM

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

middleT20917416087.0108.713.842.5MEDIUM
powerplayT209838741.595.49.247.1LOW
deathT206704935.0142.922.434.7LOW

Bowling

middleT2015010594.211.7MEDIUM
powerplayT20726635.522.0LOW

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET201220920869.7100.512.045.2MEDIUM
UNKNOWNT208977397.0132.917.837.0LOW

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.