Amna Tariq betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 37 | 227 | 418 | 7.3 | 54.3 | 2.9 | 56.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 869 | 678 | 33 | 4.7 | 20.5 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Amna Tariq scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Malaysia (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 77 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 71.4 vs 54.3 overall, average 27.5 vs 7.3 overall.
- Venue: Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) (T20)LOW sample
59 runs off 81 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 72.8 vs 54.3 overall, average 14.8 vs 7.3 overall.
- Venue: Johor Cricket Academy Oval (T20)LOW sample
44 runs off 60 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 73.3 vs 54.3 overall, average 44.0 vs 7.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Myanmar | T20 | 7 | 44 | 81 | 8.8 | 54.3 | 2.5 | 48.1 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 4 | 55 | 77 | 27.5 | 71.4 | 2.6 | 48.1 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 2 | 31 | 47 | 15.5 | 66.0 | 2.1 | 46.8 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 3 | 14 | 41 | 4.7 | 34.1 | 0.0 | 65.9 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 4 | 15 | 39 | 3.8 | 38.5 | 2.6 | 74.4 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 3 | 13 | 38 | 6.5 | 34.2 | 0.0 | 65.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Myanmar | T20 | 186 | 136 | 5 | 4.4 | 27.2 | MEDIUM |
| Singapore | T20 | 114 | 59 | 4 | 3.1 | 14.8 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 78 | 50 | 9 | 3.8 | 5.6 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 75 | 62 | 3 | 5.0 | 20.7 | LOW |
| Bhutan | T20 | 66 | 43 | 4 | 3.9 | 10.8 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 60 | 53 | 1 | 5.3 | 53.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 54 | 44 | 0 | 4.9 | — | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 48 | 59 | 0 | 7.4 | — | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 48 | 74 | 1 | 9.3 | 74.0 | LOW |
| Oman | T20 | 40 | 48 | 0 | 7.2 | — | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 40 | 17 | 2 | 2.5 | 8.5 | LOW |
| Saudi Arabia | T20 | 36 | 13 | 2 | 2.2 | 6.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 4 | 59 | 81 | 14.8 | 72.8 | 6.2 | 45.7 | LOW |
| Johor Cricket Academy Oval | T20 | 2 | 44 | 60 | 44.0 | 73.3 | 3.3 | 48.3 | LOW |
| Singapore National Cricket Ground | T20 | 7 | 31 | 54 | 5.2 | 57.4 | 7.4 | 63.0 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 7 | 21 | 48 | 3.5 | 43.8 | 0.0 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 2 | 15 | 41 | 7.5 | 36.6 | 0.0 | 63.4 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 5 | 10 | 39 | 2.5 | 25.6 | 0.0 | 76.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Singapore National Cricket Ground | T20 | 168 | 114 | 6 | 4.1 | 19.0 | MEDIUM |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 143 | 91 | 9 | 3.8 | 10.1 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 126 | 108 | 5 | 5.1 | 21.6 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 108 | 95 | 2 | 5.3 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 80 | 82 | 2 | 6.1 | 41.0 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 72 | 61 | 1 | 5.1 | 61.0 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 48 | 38 | 2 | 4.8 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Johor Cricket Academy Oval | T20 | 46 | 43 | 1 | 5.6 | 43.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 37 | 227 | 418 | 7.3 | 54.3 | 2.9 | 56.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 869 | 678 | 33 | 4.7 | 20.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 23 | 82 | 177 | 5.5 | 46.3 | 1.1 | 60.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 17 | 84 | 140 | 9.3 | 60.0 | 5.7 | 59.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 12 | 61 | 101 | 8.7 | 60.4 | 2.0 | 45.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 472 | 325 | 20 | 4.1 | 16.3 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 233 | 175 | 7 | 4.5 | 25.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 164 | 178 | 6 | 6.5 | 29.7 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 125 | 211 | 8.9 | 59.2 | 4.7 | 54.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 24 | 85 | 170 | 6.1 | 50.0 | 1.2 | 59.4 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 17 | 37 | 5.7 | 45.9 | 0.0 | 54.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.