Anthony Hillman betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 4 | 117 | 94 | 58.5 | 124.5 | 10.6 | 23.4 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 1 | 50 | 44 | — | 113.6 | 4.5 | 22.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 67 | 50 | 33.5 | 134.0 | 16.0 | 24.0 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 1 | 50 | 44 | — | 113.6 | 4.5 | 22.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 4 | 117 | 94 | 58.5 | 124.5 | 10.6 | 23.4 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 2 | 46 | 39 | — | 117.9 | 10.3 | 30.8 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 3 | 44 | 30 | 22.0 | 146.7 | 20.0 | 26.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 4 | 87 | 65 | 43.5 | 133.8 | 15.4 | 27.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.