Arslan Amjad betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 380 | 361 | 15.2 | 105.3 | 12.7 | 46.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 134 | 248 | 12 | 11.1 | 20.7 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Arslan Amjad scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
200 runs off 179 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 111.7 vs 105.3 overall, average 25.0 vs 15.2 overall.
- Opposition: Cyprus (T20)LOW sample
112 runs off 80 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 140.0 vs 105.3 overall, average 18.7 vs 15.2 overall.
- Opposition: Malta (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 73 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 131.5 vs 105.3 overall, average 24.0 vs 15.2 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground (T20)LOW sample
112 runs off 80 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 140.0 vs 105.3 overall, average 18.7 vs 15.2 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 71 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 135.2 vs 105.3 overall, average 32.0 vs 15.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
190 runs off 201 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 94.5 vs 105.3 overall, average 15.8 vs 15.2 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
121 runs off 150 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 80.7 vs 105.3 overall, average 9.3 vs 15.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Cyprus | T20 | 6 | 112 | 80 | 18.7 | 140.0 | 20.0 | 38.8 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 4 | 96 | 73 | 24.0 | 131.5 | 15.1 | 34.2 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 3 | 38 | 47 | 19.0 | 80.9 | 8.5 | 51.1 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 2 | 43 | 43 | 43.0 | 100.0 | 9.3 | 32.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Malta | T20 | 54 | 94 | 4 | 10.4 | 23.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 6 | 112 | 80 | 18.7 | 140.0 | 20.0 | 38.8 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 96 | 71 | 32.0 | 135.2 | 15.5 | 32.4 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 41 | 48 | 13.7 | 85.4 | 10.4 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Estonian National Cricket and Rugby Field | T20 | 5 | 36 | 46 | 9.0 | 78.3 | 6.5 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 2 | 43 | 43 | 43.0 | 100.0 | 9.3 | 32.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 54 | 94 | 4 | 10.4 | 23.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 380 | 361 | 15.2 | 105.3 | 12.7 | 46.8 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 134 | 248 | 12 | 11.1 | 20.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 13 | 200 | 179 | 25.0 | 111.7 | 11.2 | 37.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 22 | 121 | 150 | 9.3 | 80.7 | 12.0 | 63.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 5 | 59 | 32 | 14.8 | 184.4 | 25.0 | 21.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 78 | 136 | 7 | 10.5 | 19.4 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 44 | 84 | 5 | 11.5 | 16.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 20 | 190 | 201 | 15.8 | 94.5 | 11.4 | 51.2 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 117 | 104 | 16.7 | 112.5 | 12.5 | 44.2 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 73 | 56 | 12.2 | 130.4 | 17.9 | 35.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.