Attia Diwan Ali betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 1.8 | 37.5 | 4.2 | 75.0 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 168 | 245 | 4 | 8.8 | 61.3 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Luxembourg | T20 | 66 | 98 | 2 | 8.9 | 49.0 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 60 | 82 | 1 | 8.2 | 82.0 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 36 | 59 | 0 | 9.8 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 66 | 98 | 2 | 8.9 | 49.0 | LOW |
| Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst | T20 | 60 | 82 | 1 | 8.2 | 82.0 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 42 | 65 | 1 | 9.3 | 65.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 168 | 245 | 4 | 8.8 | 61.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 132 | 188 | 3 | 8.5 | 62.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.