Aziz Mohammad betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 19 | 450 | 335 | 26.5 | 134.3 | 21.2 | 46.0 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 270 | 381 | 14 | 8.5 | 27.2 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Aziz Mohammad scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Hungary (T20)LOW sample
128 runs off 88 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 145.5 vs 134.3 overall, average 42.7 vs 26.5 overall.
- Opposition: Gibraltar (T20)LOW sample
139 runs off 73 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 190.4 vs 134.3 overall, average 139.0 vs 26.5 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)LOW sample
147 runs off 117 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 125.6 vs 134.3 overall, average 36.8 vs 26.5 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
155 runs off 89 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 174.2 vs 134.3 overall, average 25.8 vs 26.5 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
157 runs off 90 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 174.4 vs 134.3 overall, average 22.4 vs 26.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
237 runs off 204 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 116.2 vs 134.3 overall, average 23.7 vs 26.5 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
293 runs off 245 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 119.6 vs 134.3 overall, average 29.3 vs 26.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Hungary | T20 | 4 | 128 | 88 | 42.7 | 145.5 | 23.9 | 35.2 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 2 | 139 | 73 | 139.0 | 190.4 | 30.1 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 3 | 72 | 51 | 24.0 | 141.2 | 23.5 | 43.1 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 3 | 30 | 45 | 10.0 | 66.7 | 6.7 | 62.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Austria | T20 | 72 | 103 | 5 | 8.6 | 20.6 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 42 | 71 | 2 | 10.1 | 35.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 4 | 147 | 117 | 36.8 | 125.6 | 18.8 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 4 | 42 | 53 | 10.5 | 79.2 | 11.3 | 60.4 | LOW |
| Velden Cricket Ground, Latschach | T20 | 3 | 72 | 51 | 24.0 | 141.2 | 23.5 | 43.1 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 2 | 67 | 48 | 67.0 | 139.6 | 22.9 | 43.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 72 | 100 | 2 | 8.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Velden Cricket Ground, Latschach | T20 | 72 | 103 | 5 | 8.6 | 20.6 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 51 | 80 | 4 | 9.4 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 36 | 31 | 2 | 5.2 | 15.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 19 | 450 | 335 | 26.5 | 134.3 | 21.2 | 46.0 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 270 | 381 | 14 | 8.5 | 27.2 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 19 | 293 | 245 | 29.3 | 119.6 | 20.0 | 53.9 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 8 | 157 | 90 | 22.4 | 174.4 | 24.4 | 24.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 96 | 151 | 3 | 9.4 | 50.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 90 | 128 | 6 | 8.5 | 21.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 84 | 102 | 5 | 7.3 | 20.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 16 | 237 | 204 | 23.7 | 116.2 | 18.6 | 51.0 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 11 | 155 | 89 | 25.8 | 174.2 | 27.0 | 38.2 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 4 | 58 | 42 | 58.0 | 138.1 | 21.4 | 38.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.