B de Leede betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 72 | 1467 | 1419 | 25.3 | 103.4 | 12.8 | 44.5 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 13 | 289 | 407 | 24.1 | 71.0 | 8.1 | 58.0 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where B de Leede scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Thailand (ODI)MEDIUM sample
164 runs off 251 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 65.3 vs 71.0 overall, average 32.8 vs 24.1 overall.
- Opposition: Italy (T20)MEDIUM sample
223 runs off 172 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 129.7 vs 103.4 overall, average 111.5 vs 25.3 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)MEDIUM sample
196 runs off 270 balls in 8 ODI matches — strike rate 72.6 vs 71.0 overall, average 49.0 vs 24.1 overall.
- Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
133 runs off 114 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 116.7 vs 103.4 overall, average 33.3 vs 25.3 overall.
- Opposition: United States of America (T20)LOW sample
129 runs off 106 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 121.7 vs 103.4 overall, average 32.3 vs 25.3 overall.
- Opposition: Bangladesh (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 70 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 142.9 vs 103.4 overall, average 25.0 vs 25.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
531 runs off 572 balls in 62 T20 matches — strike rate 92.8 vs 103.4 overall, average 31.2 vs 25.3 overall.
- Opposition: Scotland (T20)MEDIUM sample
109 runs off 140 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 77.9 vs 103.4 overall, average 12.1 vs 25.3 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)MEDIUM sample
98 runs off 123 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 79.7 vs 103.4 overall, average 24.5 vs 25.3 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)MEDIUM sample
93 runs off 136 balls in 13 ODI matches — strike rate 68.4 vs 71.0 overall, average 13.3 vs 24.1 overall.
- Opposition: Ireland (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 113 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 85.0 vs 103.4 overall, average 16.0 vs 25.3 overall.
- Venue: Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 79 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 94.9 vs 103.4 overall, average 37.5 vs 25.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Thailand | ODI | 6 | 164 | 251 | 32.8 | 65.3 | 6.8 | 58.6 | MEDIUM |
| Thailand | T20 | 11 | 196 | 203 | 24.5 | 96.6 | 15.8 | 52.2 | MEDIUM |
| Italy | T20 | 5 | 223 | 172 | 111.5 | 129.7 | 14.5 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| Scotland | T20 | 9 | 109 | 140 | 12.1 | 77.9 | 7.1 | 48.6 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 5 | 98 | 123 | 24.5 | 79.7 | 9.8 | 52.8 | MEDIUM |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 4 | 133 | 114 | 33.3 | 116.7 | 12.3 | 36.0 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 7 | 96 | 113 | 16.0 | 85.0 | 10.6 | 46.9 | LOW |
| Ireland | ODI | 3 | 85 | 112 | 28.3 | 75.9 | 8.0 | 54.5 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 5 | 129 | 106 | 32.3 | 121.7 | 13.2 | 38.7 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 3 | 96 | 90 | 32.0 | 106.7 | 14.4 | 44.4 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 4 | 100 | 70 | 25.0 | 142.9 | 20.0 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Australia | T20 | 1 | 56 | 57 | — | 98.2 | 8.8 | 42.1 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 1 | 30 | 41 | 30.0 | 73.2 | 4.9 | 53.7 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 2 | 37 | 40 | 18.5 | 92.5 | 15.0 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 2 | 18 | 31 | 9.0 | 58.1 | 6.5 | 67.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 14 | 292 | 277 | 26.5 | 105.4 | 11.6 | 43.3 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | ODI | 4 | 159 | 238 | 53.0 | 66.8 | 6.7 | 57.1 | MEDIUM |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 9 | 206 | 201 | 22.9 | 102.5 | 14.9 | 46.3 | MEDIUM |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 6 | 146 | 137 | 24.3 | 106.6 | 11.7 | 40.9 | MEDIUM |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | ODI | 1 | 76 | 97 | 76.0 | 78.4 | 8.2 | 50.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Harga, Schiedam | T20 | 3 | 126 | 88 | 126.0 | 143.2 | 17.0 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 5 | 75 | 79 | 37.5 | 94.9 | 10.1 | 44.3 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 5 | 96 | 76 | 19.2 | 126.3 | 22.4 | 44.7 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | T20 | 5 | 65 | 76 | 21.7 | 85.5 | 7.9 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 3 | 55 | 74 | 27.5 | 74.3 | 8.1 | 52.7 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 7 | 54 | 71 | 7.7 | 76.1 | 12.7 | 70.4 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 53 | 61 | 26.5 | 86.9 | 13.1 | 52.5 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 1 | 56 | 57 | — | 98.2 | 8.8 | 42.1 | LOW |
| County Ground, Bristol | T20 | 2 | 41 | 53 | 20.5 | 77.4 | 5.7 | 50.9 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 55 | 53 | 27.5 | 103.8 | 17.0 | 60.4 | LOW |
| Edgbaston, Birmingham | T20 | 1 | 50 | 45 | 50.0 | 111.1 | 11.1 | 35.6 | LOW |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 4 | 74 | 42 | 18.5 | 176.2 | 28.6 | 26.2 | LOW |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | T20 | 4 | 18 | 32 | 6.0 | 56.3 | 6.3 | 68.8 | LOW |
| Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 26 | 30 | 13.0 | 86.7 | 13.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 72 | 1467 | 1419 | 25.3 | 103.4 | 12.8 | 44.5 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 13 | 289 | 407 | 24.1 | 71.0 | 8.1 | 58.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 49 | 728 | 710 | 24.3 | 102.5 | 10.6 | 39.6 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 66 | 569 | 591 | 31.6 | 96.3 | 14.2 | 53.1 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 13 | 152 | 224 | 21.7 | 67.9 | 9.8 | 66.1 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 6 | 137 | 183 | 27.4 | 74.9 | 6.0 | 48.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 13 | 170 | 118 | 17.0 | 144.1 | 18.6 | 31.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 58 | 847 | 768 | 22.9 | 110.3 | 13.8 | 42.4 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 62 | 531 | 572 | 31.2 | 92.8 | 11.4 | 48.6 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 8 | 196 | 270 | 49.0 | 72.6 | 8.1 | 55.9 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 13 | 93 | 136 | 13.3 | 68.4 | 8.1 | 61.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 89 | 79 | 22.3 | 112.7 | 12.7 | 35.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.