B Tau betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 38 | 703 | 762 | 27.0 | 92.3 | 11.7 | 48.3 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 8 | 123 | 224 | 15.4 | 54.9 | 5.8 | 63.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where B Tau scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
395 runs off 427 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 92.5 vs 92.3 overall, average 43.9 vs 27.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
372 runs off 443 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 84.0 vs 92.3 overall, average 37.2 vs 27.0 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
169 runs off 120 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 140.8 vs 92.3 overall, average 18.8 vs 27.0 overall.
- Opposition: Indonesia (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 94 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 108.5 vs 92.3 overall, average 102.0 vs 27.0 overall.
- Venue: Albert Park 1, Suva (T20)LOW sample
122 runs off 94 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 129.8 vs 92.3 overall, not yet dismissed vs 27.0 overall.
- Venue: VRA Ground, Amstelveen (ODI)LOW sample
50 runs off 72 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 69.4 vs 54.9 overall, average 25.0 vs 15.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok (T20)MEDIUM sample
111 runs off 144 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 77.1 vs 92.3 overall, average 27.8 vs 27.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
240 runs off 282 balls in 32 T20 matches — strike rate 85.1 vs 92.3 overall, average 16.0 vs 27.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
162 runs off 199 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 81.4 vs 92.3 overall, average 23.1 vs 27.0 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 77 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 81.8 vs 92.3 overall, average 31.5 vs 27.0 overall.
- Venue: Amini Park, Port Moresby (T20)LOW sample
55 runs off 76 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 72.4 vs 92.3 overall, average 9.2 vs 27.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)LOW sample
42 runs off 90 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 46.7 vs 54.9 overall, average 10.5 vs 15.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Scotland | ODI | 3 | 88 | 148 | 29.3 | 59.5 | 6.1 | 62.2 | MEDIUM |
| Scotland | T20 | 4 | 95 | 103 | 31.7 | 92.2 | 8.7 | 42.7 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 2 | 102 | 94 | 102.0 | 108.5 | 14.9 | 40.4 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 4 | 82 | 91 | 27.3 | 90.1 | 11.0 | 48.4 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 3 | 63 | 77 | 31.5 | 81.8 | 10.4 | 53.2 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 2 | 70 | 71 | 35.0 | 98.6 | 12.7 | 50.7 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 4 | 36 | 46 | 12.0 | 78.3 | 13.0 | 60.9 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 4 | 37 | 46 | 18.5 | 80.4 | 10.9 | 56.5 | LOW |
| Samoa | T20 | 4 | 37 | 43 | 12.3 | 86.0 | 11.6 | 65.1 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 1 | 23 | 35 | 23.0 | 65.7 | 8.6 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 2 | 15 | 34 | 7.5 | 44.1 | 5.9 | 70.6 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 1 | 34 | 34 | — | 100.0 | 14.7 | 44.1 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 1 | 17 | 32 | 17.0 | 53.1 | 6.3 | 62.5 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 1 | 35 | 32 | 35.0 | 109.4 | 12.5 | 28.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 7 | 111 | 144 | 27.8 | 77.1 | 10.4 | 54.9 | MEDIUM |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 95 | 107 | 31.7 | 88.8 | 10.3 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Vanuatu Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 86 | 95 | 28.7 | 90.5 | 10.5 | 50.5 | LOW |
| Albert Park 1, Suva | T20 | 3 | 122 | 94 | — | 129.8 | 20.2 | 33.0 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 2 | 42 | 89 | 21.0 | 47.2 | 3.4 | 66.3 | LOW |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 6 | 55 | 76 | 9.2 | 72.4 | 9.2 | 61.8 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 2 | 50 | 72 | 25.0 | 69.4 | 9.7 | 61.1 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 4 | 68 | 61 | 34.0 | 111.5 | 9.8 | 32.8 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 2 | 28 | 53 | 14.0 | 52.8 | 5.7 | 62.3 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 34 | 41 | 34.0 | 82.9 | 12.2 | 56.1 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 21 | 41 | 7.0 | 51.2 | 7.3 | 68.3 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | T20 | 1 | 39 | 33 | 39.0 | 118.2 | 15.2 | 39.4 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 1 | 35 | 32 | 35.0 | 109.4 | 12.5 | 28.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 35 | 669 | 721 | 26.8 | 92.8 | 11.7 | 47.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 120 | 214 | 20.0 | 56.1 | 6.1 | 63.6 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 34 | 41 | 34.0 | 82.9 | 12.2 | 56.1 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 28 | 372 | 443 | 37.2 | 84.0 | 9.0 | 47.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 21 | 162 | 199 | 23.1 | 81.4 | 10.6 | 55.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 17 | 169 | 120 | 18.8 | 140.8 | 23.3 | 37.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 5 | 61 | 113 | 12.2 | 54.0 | 6.2 | 66.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 6 | 62 | 111 | 20.7 | 55.9 | 5.4 | 60.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 27 | 395 | 427 | 43.9 | 92.5 | 10.3 | 44.5 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 32 | 240 | 282 | 16.0 | 85.1 | 12.1 | 56.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 5 | 72 | 110 | 18.0 | 65.5 | 7.3 | 57.3 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 6 | 42 | 90 | 10.5 | 46.7 | 4.4 | 67.8 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 68 | 53 | 34.0 | 128.3 | 20.8 | 35.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.