£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

Bilal Zalmai betting stats, splits & projections

All-rounder

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT2059156797429.0160.926.139.9HIGH
overallT2013551589677.023.7HIGH

Why we like it

Splits where Bilal Zalmai scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample

    686 runs off 362 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 189.5 vs 160.9 overall, average 36.1 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample

    546 runs off 298 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 183.2 vs 160.9 overall, average 42.0 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample

    246 runs off 134 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 183.6 vs 160.9 overall, average 27.3 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Opposition: Norway (T20)LOW sample

    127 runs off 75 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 169.3 vs 160.9 overall, average 31.8 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Venue: GB Oval, Szodliget (T20)LOW sample

    202 runs off 117 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 172.6 vs 160.9 overall, average 33.7 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample

    168 runs off 93 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 180.6 vs 160.9 overall, average 56.0 vs 29.0 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample

    775 runs off 542 balls in 57 T20 matches — strike rate 143.0 vs 160.9 overall, average 24.2 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample

    836 runs off 590 balls in 55 T20 matches — strike rate 141.7 vs 160.9 overall, average 25.3 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Venue: Velden Cricket Ground, Latschach (T20)MEDIUM sample

    245 runs off 176 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 139.2 vs 160.9 overall, average 27.2 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Opposition: Switzerland (T20)LOW sample

    148 runs off 102 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 145.1 vs 160.9 overall, average 37.0 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Opposition: Belgium (T20)LOW sample

    96 runs off 65 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 147.7 vs 160.9 overall, average 19.2 vs 29.0 overall.

  • Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)LOW sample

    97 runs off 68 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 142.6 vs 160.9 overall, average 24.3 vs 29.0 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

RomaniaT20927617534.5157.724.637.7MEDIUM
HungaryT20820612625.8163.525.441.3MEDIUM
SwitzerlandT20414810237.0145.125.543.1LOW
NorwayT2051277531.8169.329.342.7LOW
BelgiumT205966519.2147.723.146.2LOW
Czech RepublicT20210164101.0157.825.037.5LOW
GermanyT2041255741.7219.338.633.3LOW
SwedenT203835727.7145.622.838.6LOW
FranceT203874743.5185.129.831.9LOW
SloveniaT203594219.7140.521.433.3LOW
MaltaT203644021.3160.022.535.0LOW
CroatiaT201683068.0226.736.730.0LOW

Bowling

HungaryT2018321877.131.1MEDIUM
RomaniaT2016821487.626.8MEDIUM
NorwayT20120125106.312.5LOW
BelgiumT2011417849.444.5LOW
SloveniaT20969165.715.2LOW
SwitzerlandT209611957.423.8LOW
GermanyT207812529.662.5LOW
FranceT20729828.249.0LOW
MaltaT20729017.590.0LOW
SwedenT20727916.679.0LOW
CyprusT20484836.016.0LOW
IsraelT20483834.812.7LOW
Czech RepublicT20442573.43.6LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

Velden Cricket Ground, LatschachT20924517627.2139.223.343.8MEDIUM
Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov CountyT201123515021.4156.724.742.0MEDIUM
GB Oval, SzodligetT20720211733.7172.626.530.8LOW
Botkyrka Cricket Center, StockholmT20716810828.0155.625.039.8LOW
Simar Cricket Ground, RomeT2041689356.0180.631.238.7LOW
Scott Page Field, VinorT2041428847.3161.427.338.6LOW
Marsa Sports ClubT204976824.3142.617.641.2LOW
Bayer Uerdingen Cricket GroundT2041255741.7219.338.633.3LOW
Happy Valley Ground 2T205675313.4126.422.656.6LOW
Happy Valley GroundT202884144.0214.634.129.3LOW

Bowling

Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov CountyT20228294107.729.4MEDIUM
Velden Cricket Ground, LatschachT20216300118.327.3MEDIUM
Botkyrka Cricket Center, StockholmT2016816095.717.8MEDIUM
GB Oval, SzodligetT2014415076.321.4LOW
Happy Valley Ground 2T2012013456.726.8LOW
Simar Cricket Ground, RomeT209610046.325.0LOW
Marsa Sports ClubT209312818.3128.0LOW
Scott Page Field, VinorT209285125.57.1LOW
Bayer Uerdingen Cricket GroundT207812529.662.5LOW
Ballpark Ground, GrazT20484315.443.0LOW
Happy Valley GroundT20485046.312.5LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT2059156797429.0160.926.139.9HIGH

Bowling

UnknownT2013551589677.023.7HIGH

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

powerplayT205583659025.3141.723.243.7HIGH
middleT202668636236.1189.530.134.3HIGH

Bowling

middleT2011421355547.125.1HIGH
powerplayT2015616286.220.3MEDIUM
deathT20577257.614.4LOW

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET205777554224.2143.023.142.4HIGH
SPINT202654629842.0183.229.535.9MEDIUM
UNKNOWNT202324613427.3183.630.638.8MEDIUM

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.