BM Pecic betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 337 | 305 | 22.5 | 110.5 | 12.8 | 42.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where BM Pecic scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
228 runs off 174 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 131.0 vs 110.5 overall, average 38.0 vs 22.5 overall.
- Opposition: Slovenia (T20)LOW sample
130 runs off 60 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 216.7 vs 110.5 overall, average 65.0 vs 22.5 overall.
- Venue: Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
130 runs off 60 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 216.7 vs 110.5 overall, average 65.0 vs 22.5 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
123 runs off 106 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 116.0 vs 110.5 overall, average 30.8 vs 22.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 89 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 101.1 vs 110.5 overall, average 45.0 vs 22.5 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground 2 (T20)LOW sample
48 runs off 73 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 65.8 vs 110.5 overall, average 16.0 vs 22.5 overall.
- Venue: Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 60 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 85.0 vs 110.5 overall, average 12.8 vs 22.5 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
67 runs off 92 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 72.8 vs 110.5 overall, average 9.6 vs 22.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Slovenia | T20 | 2 | 130 | 60 | 65.0 | 216.7 | 36.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 2 | 39 | 58 | 19.5 | 67.2 | 5.2 | 56.9 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 1 | 60 | 50 | — | 120.0 | 10.0 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 2 | 40 | 33 | 20.0 | 121.2 | 12.1 | 33.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 90 | 89 | 45.0 | 101.1 | 9.0 | 38.2 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 3 | 48 | 73 | 16.0 | 65.8 | 4.1 | 50.7 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 51 | 60 | 12.8 | 85.0 | 5.0 | 43.3 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 130 | 60 | 65.0 | 216.7 | 36.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 337 | 305 | 22.5 | 110.5 | 12.8 | 42.6 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 12 | 192 | 179 | 21.3 | 107.3 | 10.6 | 38.5 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 123 | 106 | 30.8 | 116.0 | 17.0 | 52.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 16 | 228 | 174 | 38.0 | 131.0 | 17.8 | 38.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 67 | 92 | 9.6 | 72.8 | 3.3 | 47.8 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 42 | 39 | 21.0 | 107.7 | 12.8 | 48.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.