C Crowe betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 8 | 56 | 95 | 11.2 | 58.9 | 5.3 | 54.7 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Jersey | T20 | 2 | 32 | 46 | 32.0 | 69.6 | 6.5 | 52.2 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 2 | 13 | 30 | 6.5 | 43.3 | 6.7 | 70.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| New Farnley CC, Leeds | T20 | 3 | 20 | 46 | 6.7 | 43.5 | 6.5 | 71.7 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 1 | 25 | 30 | — | 83.3 | 6.7 | 40.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 8 | 56 | 95 | 11.2 | 58.9 | 5.3 | 54.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 5 | 31 | 51 | 10.3 | 60.8 | 5.9 | 54.9 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 4 | 13 | 31 | 6.5 | 41.9 | 3.2 | 61.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 6 | 41 | 58 | 20.5 | 70.7 | 6.9 | 48.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.