C De Freitas betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 11 | 438 | 269 | 39.8 | 162.8 | 22.3 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 3.5 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where C De Freitas scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Santarem Cricket Ground (T20)MEDIUM sample
267 runs off 144 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 185.4 vs 162.8 overall, average 44.5 vs 39.8 overall.
- Opposition: France (T20)LOW sample
196 runs off 100 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 196.0 vs 162.8 overall, average 49.0 vs 39.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
202 runs off 117 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 172.6 vs 162.8 overall, average 33.7 vs 39.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
207 runs off 123 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 168.3 vs 162.8 overall, average 29.6 vs 39.8 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
141 runs off 106 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 133.0 vs 162.8 overall, average 47.0 vs 39.8 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
144 runs off 104 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 138.5 vs 162.8 overall, average 48.0 vs 39.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| France | T20 | 4 | 196 | 100 | 49.0 | 196.0 | 29.0 | 23.0 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 65 | 46 | 65.0 | 141.3 | 19.6 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 71 | 44 | 35.5 | 161.4 | 22.7 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Spain | T20 | 1 | 39 | 36 | 39.0 | 108.3 | 8.3 | 33.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 6 | 267 | 144 | 44.5 | 185.4 | 27.1 | 27.8 | MEDIUM |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 141 | 106 | 47.0 | 133.0 | 16.0 | 40.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 11 | 438 | 269 | 39.8 | 162.8 | 22.3 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 11 | 231 | 145 | 77.0 | 159.3 | 23.4 | 37.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 8 | 207 | 123 | 29.6 | 168.3 | 21.1 | 27.6 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 7 | 202 | 117 | 33.7 | 172.6 | 25.6 | 30.8 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 10 | 144 | 104 | 48.0 | 138.5 | 16.3 | 34.6 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 92 | 48 | 46.0 | 191.7 | 27.1 | 35.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.