C Hartmann betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 18 | 294 | 279 | 18.4 | 105.4 | 11.5 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where C Hartmann scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Tikkurila Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
116 runs off 90 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 128.9 vs 105.4 overall, average 29.0 vs 18.4 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
83 runs off 73 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 113.7 vs 105.4 overall, average 27.7 vs 18.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Spain (T20)LOW sample
48 runs off 68 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 70.6 vs 105.4 overall, average 9.6 vs 18.4 overall.
- Opposition: Guernsey (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 61 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 83.6 vs 105.4 overall, average 25.5 vs 18.4 overall.
- Venue: King George V Sports Ground, Castel (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 61 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 83.6 vs 105.4 overall, average 25.5 vs 18.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Spain | T20 | 5 | 48 | 68 | 9.6 | 70.6 | 5.9 | 54.4 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 2 | 51 | 61 | 25.5 | 83.6 | 8.2 | 45.9 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 2 | 33 | 34 | 16.5 | 97.1 | 8.8 | 44.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 116 | 90 | 29.0 | 128.9 | 15.6 | 37.8 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 83 | 73 | 27.7 | 113.7 | 12.3 | 39.7 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 2 | 51 | 61 | 25.5 | 83.6 | 8.2 | 45.9 | LOW |
| La Manga Club Bottom Ground | T20 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 5.3 | 61.8 | 5.9 | 61.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 18 | 294 | 279 | 18.4 | 105.4 | 11.5 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 172 | 165 | 13.2 | 104.2 | 9.7 | 40.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 10 | 121 | 112 | 60.5 | 108.0 | 14.3 | 46.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 15 | 128 | 127 | 21.3 | 100.8 | 11.0 | 44.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 106 | 101 | 13.3 | 105.0 | 10.9 | 42.6 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 60 | 51 | 30.0 | 117.6 | 13.7 | 39.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.