C Mahamalage betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 25 | 245 | 381 | 14.4 | 64.3 | 5.0 | 57.0 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 660 | 621 | 33 | 5.6 | 18.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where C Mahamalage scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Germany (T20)LOW sample
99 runs off 114 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 86.8 vs 64.3 overall, average 33.0 vs 14.4 overall.
- Venue: Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
87 runs off 103 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 84.5 vs 64.3 overall, average 43.5 vs 14.4 overall.
- Venue: Grainville, St Saviour, Jersey (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 62 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 83.9 vs 64.3 overall, average 17.3 vs 14.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
115 runs off 113 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 101.8 vs 64.3 overall, average 38.3 vs 14.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 81 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 85.2 vs 64.3 overall, average 11.5 vs 14.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
83 runs off 177 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 46.9 vs 64.3 overall, average 9.2 vs 14.4 overall.
- Opposition: Netherlands (T20)LOW sample
27 runs off 67 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 40.3 vs 64.3 overall, average 4.5 vs 14.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
47 runs off 91 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 51.6 vs 64.3 overall, average 9.4 vs 14.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
60 runs off 108 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 55.6 vs 64.3 overall, average 20.0 vs 14.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 6 | 99 | 114 | 33.0 | 86.8 | 7.0 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 6 | 27 | 67 | 4.5 | 40.3 | 4.5 | 71.6 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 2 | 40 | 52 | 20.0 | 76.9 | 9.6 | 57.7 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 2 | 23 | 48 | 23.0 | 47.9 | 2.1 | 62.5 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 1 | 21 | 30 | 21.0 | 70.0 | 6.7 | 56.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Germany | T20 | 162 | 126 | 7 | 4.7 | 18.0 | MEDIUM |
| Netherlands | T20 | 90 | 100 | 2 | 6.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 54 | 63 | 2 | 7.0 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 48 | 57 | 2 | 7.1 | 28.5 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 48 | 31 | 5 | 3.9 | 6.2 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 48 | 52 | 1 | 6.5 | 52.0 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 42 | 27 | 2 | 3.9 | 13.5 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 36 | 41 | 2 | 6.8 | 20.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 87 | 103 | 43.5 | 84.5 | 5.8 | 42.7 | LOW |
| Grainville, St Saviour, Jersey | T20 | 4 | 52 | 62 | 17.3 | 83.9 | 11.3 | 58.1 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 4 | 31 | 52 | 7.8 | 59.6 | 5.8 | 59.6 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 23 | 48 | 23.0 | 47.9 | 2.1 | 62.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Harga, Schiedam | T20 | 2 | 21 | 44 | 10.5 | 47.7 | 4.5 | 68.2 | LOW |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 5 | 6 | 36 | 1.5 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 75.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 138 | 128 | 5 | 5.6 | 25.6 | LOW |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 108 | 87 | 8 | 4.8 | 10.9 | LOW |
| Grainville, St Saviour, Jersey | T20 | 96 | 69 | 3 | 4.3 | 23.0 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 84 | 86 | 7 | 6.1 | 12.3 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 78 | 53 | 6 | 4.1 | 8.8 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 60 | 67 | 3 | 6.7 | 22.3 | LOW |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 54 | 69 | 1 | 7.7 | 69.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 25 | 245 | 381 | 14.4 | 64.3 | 5.0 | 57.0 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 660 | 621 | 33 | 5.6 | 18.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 15 | 116 | 192 | 14.5 | 60.4 | 4.2 | 57.8 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 11 | 60 | 108 | 20.0 | 55.6 | 5.6 | 64.8 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 11 | 69 | 81 | 11.5 | 85.2 | 6.2 | 44.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 468 | 449 | 21 | 5.8 | 21.4 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 108 | 94 | 4 | 5.2 | 23.5 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 84 | 78 | 8 | 5.6 | 9.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 21 | 83 | 177 | 9.2 | 46.9 | 1.7 | 62.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 115 | 113 | 38.3 | 101.8 | 10.6 | 43.4 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 16 | 47 | 91 | 9.4 | 51.6 | 4.4 | 63.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.