C Munoz-Mills betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 22 | 305 | 207 | 38.1 | 147.3 | 19.8 | 30.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where C Munoz-Mills scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
162 runs off 101 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 160.4 vs 147.3 overall, average 81.0 vs 38.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
85 runs off 60 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 141.7 vs 147.3 overall, average 21.3 vs 38.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Croatia | T20 | 5 | 73 | 56 | 73.0 | 130.4 | 16.1 | 33.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 5 | 61 | 52 | 20.3 | 117.3 | 11.5 | 26.9 | LOW |
| La Manga Club Top Ground | T20 | 4 | 47 | 41 | 47.0 | 114.6 | 12.2 | 26.8 | LOW |
| Mladost Cricket Ground, Zagreb | T20 | 3 | 47 | 31 | — | 151.6 | 22.6 | 35.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 22 | 305 | 207 | 38.1 | 147.3 | 19.8 | 30.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 10 | 123 | 88 | 41.0 | 139.8 | 19.3 | 35.2 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 15 | 129 | 84 | 32.3 | 153.6 | 20.2 | 25.0 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 4 | 53 | 35 | 53.0 | 151.4 | 20.0 | 31.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 19 | 162 | 101 | 81.0 | 160.4 | 22.8 | 26.7 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 11 | 85 | 60 | 21.3 | 141.7 | 18.3 | 33.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 58 | 46 | 29.0 | 126.1 | 15.2 | 34.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.