C Roberts betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 32 | 824 | 756 | 35.8 | 109.0 | 9.7 | 29.4 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 36 | 60 | 4 | 10.0 | 15.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where C Roberts scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
528 runs off 485 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 108.9 vs 109.0 overall, average 66.0 vs 35.8 overall.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)MEDIUM sample
159 runs off 131 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 121.4 vs 109.0 overall, average 53.0 vs 35.8 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)MEDIUM sample
201 runs off 167 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 120.4 vs 109.0 overall, average 40.2 vs 35.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
324 runs off 297 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 109.1 vs 109.0 overall, average 46.3 vs 35.8 overall.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample
126 runs off 103 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 122.3 vs 109.0 overall, average 63.0 vs 35.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
167 runs off 116 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 144.0 vs 109.0 overall, average 55.7 vs 35.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
333 runs off 343 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 97.1 vs 109.0 overall, average 25.6 vs 35.8 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
152 runs off 159 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 95.6 vs 109.0 overall, average 30.4 vs 35.8 overall.
- Opposition: Belgium (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 60 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 86.7 vs 109.0 overall, average 17.3 vs 35.8 overall.
- Venue: Dreux Sport Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
86 runs off 94 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 91.5 vs 109.0 overall, average 21.5 vs 35.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Austria | T20 | 3 | 159 | 131 | 53.0 | 121.4 | 14.5 | 29.8 | MEDIUM |
| Norway | T20 | 4 | 133 | 124 | 44.3 | 107.3 | 8.1 | 25.0 | MEDIUM |
| Portugal | T20 | 4 | 103 | 90 | 51.5 | 114.4 | 7.8 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 4 | 52 | 60 | 17.3 | 86.7 | 10.0 | 53.3 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 3 | 54 | 57 | 18.0 | 94.7 | 7.0 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 2 | 55 | 57 | 27.5 | 96.5 | 3.5 | 29.8 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 1 | 50 | 38 | — | 131.6 | 13.2 | 15.8 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 1 | 26 | 34 | — | 76.5 | 5.9 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34.0 | 100.0 | 5.9 | 20.6 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 3 | 57 | 32 | 57.0 | 178.1 | 28.1 | 21.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 7 | 195 | 178 | 39.0 | 109.6 | 7.3 | 23.0 | MEDIUM |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 8 | 201 | 167 | 40.2 | 120.4 | 13.8 | 29.9 | MEDIUM |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 3 | 126 | 103 | 63.0 | 122.3 | 13.6 | 27.2 | LOW |
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 3 | 109 | 101 | 54.5 | 107.9 | 8.9 | 24.8 | LOW |
| Dreux Sport Cricket Club | T20 | 5 | 86 | 94 | 21.5 | 91.5 | 8.5 | 46.8 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 3 | 57 | 57 | 28.5 | 100.0 | 5.3 | 21.1 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 1 | 26 | 30 | 26.0 | 86.7 | 3.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 32 | 824 | 756 | 35.8 | 109.0 | 9.7 | 29.4 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 36 | 60 | 4 | 10.0 | 15.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 27 | 528 | 485 | 66.0 | 108.9 | 8.9 | 27.0 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 26 | 152 | 159 | 30.4 | 95.6 | 8.8 | 41.5 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 14 | 144 | 112 | 14.4 | 128.6 | 14.3 | 22.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 333 | 343 | 25.6 | 97.1 | 7.6 | 34.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 23 | 324 | 297 | 46.3 | 109.1 | 10.1 | 28.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 18 | 167 | 116 | 55.7 | 144.0 | 14.7 | 15.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.