CR Pagydyala betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 610 | 675 | 26.5 | 90.4 | 8.9 | 43.9 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 3 | 206 | 281 | 206.0 | 73.3 | 7.1 | 54.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 30 | 20 | 4 | 4.0 | 5.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where CR Pagydyala scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
266 runs off 300 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 88.7 vs 90.4 overall, average 38.0 vs 26.5 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (ODI)MEDIUM sample
136 runs off 152 balls in 1 ODI match — strike rate 89.5 vs 73.3 overall, not yet dismissed vs 206.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
156 runs off 180 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 86.7 vs 73.3 overall, not yet dismissed vs 206.0 overall.
- Opposition: Vanuatu (T20)LOW sample
135 runs off 108 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 125.0 vs 90.4 overall, average 135.0 vs 26.5 overall.
- Venue: Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
99 runs off 92 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 107.6 vs 90.4 overall, average 49.5 vs 26.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
249 runs off 335 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 74.3 vs 90.4 overall, average 31.1 vs 26.5 overall.
- Venue: Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas (ODI)MEDIUM sample
70 runs off 129 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 54.3 vs 73.3 overall, average 70.0 vs 206.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)MEDIUM sample
78 runs off 120 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 65.0 vs 73.3 overall, average 78.0 vs 206.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)LOW sample
41 runs off 90 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 45.6 vs 73.3 overall, average 41.0 vs 206.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 3 | 206 | 281 | 206.0 | 73.3 | 7.1 | 54.4 | MEDIUM |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 2 | 135 | 108 | 135.0 | 125.0 | 16.7 | 38.9 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 2 | 77 | 81 | 38.5 | 95.1 | 8.6 | 34.6 | LOW |
| Argentina | T20 | 2 | 58 | 67 | — | 86.6 | 0.0 | 29.9 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 54 | 62 | 18.0 | 87.1 | 11.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 5 | 34 | 55 | 6.8 | 61.8 | 9.1 | 70.9 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 2 | 31 | 44 | 15.5 | 70.5 | 0.0 | 43.2 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 1 | 32 | 34 | 32.0 | 94.1 | 14.7 | 47.1 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 1 | 35 | 33 | — | 106.1 | 6.1 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 3 | 21 | 32 | 10.5 | 65.6 | 3.1 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 2 | 18 | 32 | 9.0 | 56.3 | 3.1 | 59.4 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 1 | 36 | 31 | 36.0 | 116.1 | 16.1 | 32.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 5 | 162 | 173 | 32.4 | 93.6 | 8.1 | 37.6 | MEDIUM |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 1 | 136 | 152 | — | 89.5 | 11.8 | 51.3 | MEDIUM |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 123 | 135 | 24.6 | 91.1 | 12.6 | 46.7 | MEDIUM |
| St Albans Club, Buenos Aires | T20 | 5 | 112 | 130 | 56.0 | 86.2 | 2.3 | 36.2 | MEDIUM |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | ODI | 2 | 70 | 129 | 70.0 | 54.3 | 1.6 | 58.1 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 3 | 99 | 92 | 49.5 | 107.6 | 13.0 | 46.7 | LOW |
| Grand Prairie Stadium, Dallas | T20 | 3 | 54 | 62 | 18.0 | 87.1 | 11.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 2 | 36 | 46 | 18.0 | 78.3 | 8.7 | 47.8 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 4 | 22 | 35 | 5.5 | 62.9 | 8.6 | 71.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 610 | 675 | 26.5 | 90.4 | 8.9 | 43.9 | HIGH |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 1 | 136 | 152 | — | 89.5 | 11.8 | 51.3 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 2 | 70 | 129 | 70.0 | 54.3 | 1.6 | 58.1 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 27 | 249 | 335 | 31.1 | 74.3 | 8.7 | 56.1 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 19 | 290 | 297 | 22.3 | 97.6 | 8.1 | 34.3 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 2 | 156 | 180 | — | 86.7 | 8.3 | 43.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 3 | 41 | 90 | 41.0 | 45.6 | 4.4 | 76.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 5 | 71 | 43 | 35.5 | 165.1 | 16.3 | 14.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 22 | 295 | 317 | 21.1 | 93.1 | 9.5 | 41.0 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 25 | 266 | 300 | 38.0 | 88.7 | 9.0 | 46.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 2 | 128 | 161 | — | 79.5 | 8.1 | 49.7 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 3 | 78 | 120 | 78.0 | 65.0 | 5.8 | 60.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 49 | 58 | 24.5 | 84.5 | 5.2 | 44.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.