Craig Cachopa betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 19 | 485 | 349 | 32.3 | 139.0 | 16.3 | 30.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Craig Cachopa scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
288 runs off 194 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 148.5 vs 139.0 overall, average 36.0 vs 32.3 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
312 runs off 243 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 128.4 vs 139.0 overall, average 44.6 vs 32.3 overall.
- Opposition: Northern Districts (T20)LOW sample
152 runs off 89 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 170.8 vs 139.0 overall, average 38.0 vs 32.3 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
164 runs off 93 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 176.3 vs 139.0 overall, average 20.5 vs 32.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
154 runs off 133 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 115.8 vs 139.0 overall, average 25.7 vs 32.3 overall.
- Opposition: Wellington (T20)LOW sample
94 runs off 71 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 132.4 vs 139.0 overall, average 23.5 vs 32.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Northern Districts | T20 | 4 | 152 | 89 | 38.0 | 170.8 | 23.6 | 21.3 | LOW |
| Wellington | T20 | 4 | 94 | 71 | 23.5 | 132.4 | 14.1 | 33.8 | LOW |
| Central Districts | T20 | 4 | 83 | 63 | 83.0 | 131.7 | 14.3 | 36.5 | LOW |
| Otago | T20 | 3 | 87 | 54 | 29.0 | 161.1 | 20.4 | 20.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Eden Park Outer Oval | T20 | 9 | 236 | 167 | 33.7 | 141.3 | 16.2 | 25.7 | MEDIUM |
| Basin Reserve | T20 | 3 | 91 | 66 | 30.3 | 137.9 | 15.2 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Seddon Park | T20 | 2 | 80 | 44 | 40.0 | 181.8 | 27.3 | 22.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 19 | 485 | 349 | 32.3 | 139.0 | 16.3 | 30.7 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 15 | 312 | 243 | 44.6 | 128.4 | 13.6 | 28.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 12 | 164 | 93 | 20.5 | 176.3 | 24.7 | 32.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 15 | 288 | 194 | 36.0 | 148.5 | 18.6 | 30.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 154 | 133 | 25.7 | 115.8 | 11.3 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.