CV Anto betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 42 | 886 | 584 | 24.6 | 151.7 | 20.9 | 39.7 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where CV Anto scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Qatar (T20)LOW sample
153 runs off 98 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 156.1 vs 151.7 overall, average 38.3 vs 24.6 overall.
- Venue: Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
191 runs off 112 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 170.5 vs 151.7 overall, average 27.3 vs 24.6 overall.
- Venue: Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
175 runs off 98 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 178.6 vs 151.7 overall, average 87.5 vs 24.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
136 runs off 81 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 167.9 vs 151.7 overall, average 136.0 vs 24.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
221 runs off 170 balls in 24 T20 matches — strike rate 130.0 vs 151.7 overall, average 14.7 vs 24.6 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
271 runs off 191 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 141.9 vs 151.7 overall, average 19.4 vs 24.6 overall.
- Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
124 runs off 112 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 110.7 vs 151.7 overall, average 15.5 vs 24.6 overall.
- Opposition: Nepal (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 67 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 138.8 vs 151.7 overall, average 31.0 vs 24.6 overall.
- Venue: West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 78 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 102.6 vs 151.7 overall, average 13.3 vs 24.6 overall.
- Venue: Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 70 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 117.1 vs 151.7 overall, average 16.4 vs 24.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Hong Kong | T20 | 9 | 124 | 112 | 15.5 | 110.7 | 15.2 | 51.8 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 4 | 153 | 98 | 38.3 | 156.1 | 20.4 | 38.8 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 3 | 93 | 67 | 31.0 | 138.8 | 17.9 | 34.3 | LOW |
| Maldives | T20 | 3 | 67 | 43 | 33.5 | 155.8 | 20.9 | 37.2 | LOW |
| Mongolia | T20 | 1 | 75 | 42 | — | 178.6 | 21.4 | 21.4 | LOW |
| Oman | T20 | 4 | 66 | 36 | 16.5 | 183.3 | 33.3 | 47.2 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 2 | 51 | 34 | — | 150.0 | 17.6 | 32.4 | LOW |
| Saudi Arabia | T20 | 3 | 51 | 32 | 17.0 | 159.4 | 18.8 | 31.3 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 3 | 64 | 32 | 21.3 | 200.0 | 31.3 | 40.6 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 7 | 191 | 112 | 27.3 | 170.5 | 26.8 | 40.2 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 6 | 175 | 98 | 87.5 | 178.6 | 23.5 | 28.6 | LOW |
| West End Park International Cricket Stadium, Doha | T20 | 7 | 80 | 78 | 13.3 | 102.6 | 7.7 | 43.6 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 4 | 107 | 74 | 26.8 | 144.6 | 20.3 | 35.1 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 5 | 82 | 70 | 16.4 | 117.1 | 15.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | T20 | 5 | 91 | 59 | 18.2 | 154.2 | 20.3 | 40.7 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 3 | 107 | 43 | 35.7 | 248.8 | 41.9 | 32.6 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 3 | 45 | 42 | 22.5 | 107.1 | 14.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 42 | 886 | 584 | 24.6 | 151.7 | 20.9 | 39.7 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 39 | 615 | 393 | 28.0 | 156.5 | 23.7 | 42.7 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 18 | 271 | 191 | 19.4 | 141.9 | 15.2 | 33.5 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 38 | 529 | 333 | 26.4 | 158.9 | 23.1 | 39.3 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 24 | 221 | 170 | 14.7 | 130.0 | 15.3 | 43.5 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 19 | 136 | 81 | 136.0 | 167.9 | 23.5 | 33.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.