D Brevis betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 69 | 1797 | 1130 | 28.1 | 159.0 | 21.5 | 36.0 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 9 | 230 | 159 | 28.8 | 144.7 | 18.9 | 44.7 | MEDIUM |
| overall | HUNDRED | 8 | 212 | 148 | 35.3 | 143.2 | 18.2 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| overall | TEST | 4 | 138 | 144 | 23.0 | 95.8 | 13.2 | 54.2 | MEDIUM |
| overall | TEST | 26 | 22 | 1 | 5.1 | 22.0 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 24 | 28 | 0 | 7.0 | — | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 15 | 30 | 2 | 12.0 | 15.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where D Brevis scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
824 runs off 471 balls in 56 T20 matches — strike rate 174.9 vs 159.0 overall, average 41.2 vs 28.1 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
1284 runs off 767 balls in 56 T20 matches — strike rate 167.4 vs 159.0 overall, average 32.1 vs 28.1 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)MEDIUM sample
244 runs off 124 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 196.8 vs 159.0 overall, average 61.0 vs 28.1 overall.
- Venue: Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample
226 runs off 136 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 166.2 vs 159.0 overall, average 56.5 vs 28.1 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
247 runs off 120 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 205.8 vs 159.0 overall, average 16.5 vs 28.1 overall.
- Opposition: Australia (T20)LOW sample
185 runs off 94 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 196.8 vs 159.0 overall, average 46.3 vs 28.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
844 runs off 576 balls in 65 T20 matches — strike rate 146.5 vs 159.0 overall, average 21.6 vs 28.1 overall.
- Venue: MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai (T20)MEDIUM sample
171 runs off 128 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 133.6 vs 159.0 overall, average 28.5 vs 28.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
266 runs off 243 balls in 36 T20 matches — strike rate 109.5 vs 159.0 overall, average 29.6 vs 28.1 overall.
- Opposition: New Zealand (T20)LOW sample
134 runs off 91 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 147.3 vs 159.0 overall, average 26.8 vs 28.1 overall.
- Opposition: India (ODI)LOW sample
120 runs off 90 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 133.3 vs 144.7 overall, average 40.0 vs 28.8 overall.
- Opposition: Gujarat Titans (T20)LOW sample
113 runs off 80 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 141.3 vs 159.0 overall, average 28.3 vs 28.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 6 | 244 | 124 | 61.0 | 196.8 | 29.0 | 27.4 | MEDIUM |
| Australia | T20 | 5 | 185 | 94 | 46.3 | 196.8 | 28.7 | 28.7 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 5 | 134 | 91 | 26.8 | 147.3 | 18.7 | 40.7 | LOW |
| India | ODI | 3 | 120 | 90 | 40.0 | 133.3 | 15.6 | 41.1 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | TEST | 2 | 84 | 85 | 28.0 | 98.8 | 12.9 | 50.6 | LOW |
| Gujarat Titans | T20 | 4 | 113 | 80 | 28.3 | 141.3 | 17.5 | 32.5 | LOW |
| India | T20 | 5 | 114 | 76 | 22.8 | 150.0 | 22.4 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Kolkata Knight Riders | T20 | 3 | 122 | 73 | 40.7 | 167.1 | 24.7 | 35.6 | LOW |
| Lucknow Super Giants | T20 | 5 | 92 | 66 | 18.4 | 139.4 | 19.7 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Pakistan | TEST | 2 | 54 | 59 | 18.0 | 91.5 | 13.6 | 59.3 | LOW |
| Sunrisers Hyderabad | T20 | 3 | 86 | 56 | 28.7 | 153.6 | 19.6 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 2 | 78 | 54 | 39.0 | 144.4 | 16.7 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Punjab Kings | T20 | 2 | 81 | 51 | 40.5 | 158.8 | 23.5 | 39.2 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 3 | 55 | 43 | 18.3 | 127.9 | 14.0 | 48.8 | LOW |
| Australia | ODI | 3 | 56 | 35 | 18.7 | 160.0 | 22.9 | 48.6 | LOW |
| England | ODI | 3 | 54 | 34 | 27.0 | 158.8 | 23.5 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Delhi Capitals | T20 | 1 | 37 | 33 | 37.0 | 112.1 | 12.1 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Essex | T20 | 1 | 68 | 32 | 68.0 | 212.5 | 31.3 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Birmingham Phoenix | HUNDRED | 1 | 55 | 31 | — | 177.4 | 25.8 | 25.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad | T20 | 7 | 214 | 139 | 30.6 | 154.0 | 20.1 | 30.9 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 5 | 226 | 136 | 56.5 | 166.2 | 22.8 | 29.4 | MEDIUM |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 6 | 171 | 128 | 28.5 | 133.6 | 16.4 | 36.7 | MEDIUM |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | TEST | 2 | 84 | 85 | 28.0 | 98.8 | 12.9 | 50.6 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 5 | 133 | 71 | 33.3 | 187.3 | 25.4 | 35.2 | LOW |
| Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai | T20 | 5 | 84 | 70 | 16.8 | 120.0 | 14.3 | 45.7 | LOW |
| Lord's, London | HUNDRED | 4 | 82 | 68 | 27.3 | 120.6 | 14.7 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi | T20 | 3 | 120 | 68 | 40.0 | 176.5 | 22.1 | 29.4 | LOW |
| Marrara Stadium, Darwin | T20 | 2 | 127 | 61 | 127.0 | 208.2 | 32.8 | 27.9 | LOW |
| Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium, Pune | T20 | 3 | 86 | 55 | 28.7 | 156.4 | 25.5 | 47.3 | LOW |
| Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | TEST | 1 | 54 | 55 | 27.0 | 98.2 | 14.5 | 56.4 | LOW |
| Eden Gardens, Kolkata | T20 | 2 | 86 | 52 | 43.0 | 165.4 | 25.0 | 38.5 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 3 | 93 | 49 | 46.5 | 189.8 | 26.5 | 34.7 | LOW |
| Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | T20 | 2 | 46 | 38 | 23.0 | 121.1 | 13.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Great Barrier Reef Arena, Mackay | ODI | 2 | 50 | 33 | 25.0 | 151.5 | 21.2 | 48.5 | LOW |
| Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium, Raipur | ODI | 1 | 54 | 33 | 54.0 | 163.6 | 18.2 | 36.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 63 | 1655 | 1054 | 28.1 | 157.0 | 21.3 | 36.1 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 9 | 230 | 159 | 28.8 | 144.7 | 18.9 | 44.7 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | HUNDRED | 8 | 212 | 148 | 35.3 | 143.2 | 18.2 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | TEST | 3 | 138 | 140 | 27.6 | 98.6 | 13.6 | 52.9 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 5 | 133 | 71 | 33.3 | 187.3 | 25.4 | 35.2 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 56 | 1284 | 767 | 32.1 | 167.4 | 22.0 | 32.7 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 36 | 266 | 243 | 29.6 | 109.5 | 15.6 | 50.2 | MEDIUM |
| old_ball | TEST | 4 | 116 | 123 | 19.3 | 94.3 | 13.0 | 56.9 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 18 | 247 | 120 | 16.5 | 205.8 | 30.0 | 28.3 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 6 | 165 | 118 | 41.3 | 139.8 | 17.8 | 44.1 | LOW |
| middle | HUNDRED | 8 | 149 | 112 | 37.3 | 133.0 | 16.1 | 35.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 65 | 844 | 576 | 21.6 | 146.5 | 21.0 | 39.9 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 56 | 824 | 471 | 41.2 | 174.9 | 22.5 | 32.3 | HIGH |
| PACE | ODI | 7 | 118 | 93 | 39.3 | 126.9 | 16.1 | 47.3 | LOW |
| PACE | HUNDRED | 8 | 127 | 83 | 21.2 | 153.0 | 19.3 | 27.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 20 | 129 | 83 | 25.8 | 155.4 | 19.3 | 30.1 | LOW |
| PACE | TEST | 3 | 62 | 81 | 62.0 | 76.5 | 9.9 | 55.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | HUNDRED | 7 | 85 | 65 | — | 130.8 | 16.9 | 40.0 | LOW |
| SPIN | ODI | 8 | 99 | 61 | 19.8 | 162.3 | 21.3 | 41.0 | LOW |
| SPIN | TEST | 4 | 71 | 53 | 14.2 | 134.0 | 20.8 | 52.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.