D Doyle-Calle betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 33 | 834 | 602 | 33.4 | 138.5 | 16.8 | 36.4 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 5.3 | 8.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where D Doyle-Calle scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
445 runs off 314 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 141.7 vs 138.5 overall, average 63.6 vs 33.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
275 runs off 186 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 147.8 vs 138.5 overall, average 39.3 vs 33.4 overall.
- Opposition: Croatia (T20)LOW sample
144 runs off 92 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 156.5 vs 138.5 overall, average 28.8 vs 33.4 overall.
- Opposition: Isle of Man (T20)LOW sample
137 runs off 82 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 167.1 vs 138.5 overall, average 137.0 vs 33.4 overall.
- Venue: La Manga Club Top Ground (T20)LOW sample
148 runs off 91 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 162.6 vs 138.5 overall, average 49.3 vs 33.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
173 runs off 66 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 262.1 vs 138.5 overall, average 24.7 vs 33.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria (T20)MEDIUM sample
130 runs off 144 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 90.3 vs 138.5 overall, average 16.3 vs 33.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
216 runs off 222 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 97.3 vs 138.5 overall, average 19.6 vs 33.4 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
78 runs off 63 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 123.8 vs 138.5 overall, average 78.0 vs 33.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Croatia | T20 | 7 | 144 | 92 | 28.8 | 156.5 | 18.5 | 30.4 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 5 | 137 | 82 | 137.0 | 167.1 | 23.2 | 25.6 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 2 | 71 | 52 | 35.5 | 136.5 | 15.4 | 26.9 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 2 | 57 | 46 | 28.5 | 123.9 | 10.9 | 32.6 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 2 | 32 | 45 | 16.0 | 71.1 | 6.7 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 45 | 44 | 22.5 | 102.3 | 9.1 | 47.7 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 1 | 72 | 41 | 72.0 | 175.6 | 22.0 | 26.8 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 2 | 54 | 38 | 54.0 | 142.1 | 18.4 | 42.1 | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 1 | 52 | 35 | 52.0 | 148.6 | 11.4 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 2 | 45 | 34 | 22.5 | 132.4 | 20.6 | 44.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 8 | 130 | 144 | 16.3 | 90.3 | 9.7 | 52.8 | MEDIUM |
| La Manga Club Top Ground | T20 | 5 | 148 | 91 | 49.3 | 162.6 | 18.7 | 25.3 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 78 | 63 | 78.0 | 123.8 | 11.1 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 109 | 55 | 109.0 | 198.2 | 27.3 | 27.3 | LOW |
| La Manga Club Bottom Ground | T20 | 4 | 90 | 54 | 90.0 | 166.7 | 20.4 | 18.5 | LOW |
| Mladost Cricket Ground, Zagreb | T20 | 4 | 67 | 53 | 16.8 | 126.4 | 15.1 | 35.8 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 2 | 78 | 46 | 78.0 | 169.6 | 21.7 | 28.3 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 2 | 57 | 38 | 28.5 | 150.0 | 13.2 | 21.1 | LOW |
| Meersen, Gent | T20 | 2 | 41 | 32 | 20.5 | 128.1 | 18.8 | 53.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 33 | 834 | 602 | 33.4 | 138.5 | 16.8 | 36.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 445 | 314 | 63.6 | 141.7 | 14.0 | 23.2 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 23 | 216 | 222 | 19.6 | 97.3 | 14.0 | 58.6 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 9 | 173 | 66 | 24.7 | 262.1 | 39.4 | 24.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 374 | 280 | 31.2 | 133.6 | 17.9 | 43.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 21 | 275 | 186 | 39.3 | 147.8 | 15.1 | 26.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 185 | 136 | 30.8 | 136.0 | 16.9 | 36.0 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.