D Kansonkho betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 33 | 489 | 520 | 20.4 | 94.0 | 10.0 | 45.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 28 | 26 | 2 | 5.6 | 13.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where D Kansonkho scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Rwanda (T20)MEDIUM sample
199 runs off 218 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 91.3 vs 94.0 overall, average 33.2 vs 20.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
289 runs off 282 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 102.5 vs 94.0 overall, average 22.2 vs 20.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
132 runs off 162 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 81.5 vs 94.0 overall, average 26.4 vs 20.4 overall.
- Opposition: Bahrain (T20)LOW sample
35 runs off 73 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 47.9 vs 94.0 overall, average 5.8 vs 20.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
68 runs off 76 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 89.5 vs 94.0 overall, average 11.3 vs 20.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Rwanda | T20 | 10 | 199 | 218 | 33.2 | 91.3 | 8.7 | 41.3 | MEDIUM |
| Bahrain | T20 | 6 | 35 | 73 | 5.8 | 47.9 | 4.1 | 63.0 | LOW |
| Ghana | T20 | 2 | 44 | 47 | 44.0 | 93.6 | 6.4 | 44.7 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 3 | 45 | 39 | 15.0 | 115.4 | 15.4 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Lesotho | T20 | 1 | 29 | 38 | — | 76.3 | 2.6 | 44.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 10 | 156 | 177 | 22.3 | 88.1 | 8.5 | 45.8 | MEDIUM |
| TCA Oval, Blantyre | T20 | 11 | 161 | 175 | 17.9 | 92.0 | 10.9 | 44.6 | MEDIUM |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Dar-es-Salaam | T20 | 2 | 50 | 55 | 50.0 | 90.9 | 9.1 | 49.1 | LOW |
| University of Dar-es-Salaam Ground | T20 | 3 | 66 | 51 | 33.0 | 129.4 | 13.7 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Sikh Union Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 2 | 22 | 31 | 22.0 | 71.0 | 3.2 | 41.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 33 | 489 | 520 | 20.4 | 94.0 | 10.0 | 45.2 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 28 | 251 | 262 | 19.3 | 95.8 | 12.6 | 52.3 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 17 | 214 | 238 | 19.5 | 89.9 | 6.7 | 39.1 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 28 | 289 | 282 | 22.2 | 102.5 | 12.1 | 44.7 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 19 | 132 | 162 | 26.4 | 81.5 | 6.8 | 47.5 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 15 | 68 | 76 | 11.3 | 89.5 | 9.2 | 42.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.